Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35100382›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Modeling allelic diversity of multiparent mapping populations affects detection of quantitative trait loci.

Sarah G Odell, Asher I Hudson, Sébastien Praud, Pierre Dubreuil, Marie-Hélène Tixier, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra, Daniel E Runcie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic dissection of grain yield and correlated proxy traits under suboptimal conditions.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah G OdellDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0316-7506
Asher I HudsonDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9520-8901
Sébastien PraudLimagrain, Centre de Recherche de Chappes, Chappes 63720, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4474-9115
Pierre DubreuilLimagrain, Centre de Recherche de Chappes, Chappes 63720, France.
Marie-Hélène TixierLimagrain, Centre de Recherche de Chappes, Chappes 63720, France.
Jeffrey Ross-IbarraDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1656-4954
Daniel E RuncieDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3008-9312
University of California, Davis · USLimagrain (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for quantitative trait loci that explain complex traits such as yield and drought tolerance has been ongoing in all crops. Methods such as biparental quantitative trait loci mapping and genome-wide association studies each have their own advantages and limitations. Multiparent advanced generation intercross populations contain more recombination events and genetic diversity than biparental mapping populations and are better able to estimate effect sizes of rare alleles than association mapping populations. Here, we discuss the results of using a multiparent advanced generation intercross population of doubled haploid maize lines created from 16 diverse founders to perform quantitative trait loci mapping. We compare 3 models that assume bi-allelic, founder, and ancestral haplotype allelic states for quantitative trait loci. The 3 methods have differing power to detect quantitative trait loci for a variety of agronomic traits. Although the founder approach finds the most quantitative trait loci, all methods are able to find unique quantitative trait loci, suggesting that each model has advantages for traits with different genetic architectures. A closer look at a well-characterized flowering time quantitative trait loci, qDTA8, which contains vgt1, highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each method and suggests a potential epistatic interaction. Overall, our results reinforce the importance of considering different approaches to analyzing genotypic datasets, and shows the limitations of binary SNP data for identifying multiallelic quantitative trait loci.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyQuantitative Trait LociAllelesChromosome MappingCrosses, Geneticassociation mappinglinkage mappingMAGICMPPmultiparent advanced generation intercross (MAGIC)multiparental populationsQTL

Identifiers

PMID35100382
PMCPMC8895984
OpenAlexW4220967997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.