ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022
Gap-com: general model selection criterion for sparse undirected gene networks with nontrivial community structure.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- HMFGraph: Novel Bayesian approach for recovering biological networks.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce a new model selection criterion for sparse complex gene network modeling where gene co-expression relationships are estimated from data. This is a novel formulation of the gap statistic and it can be used for the optimal choice of a regularization parameter in graphical models. Our criterion favors gene network structure which differs from a trivial gene interaction structure obtained totally at random. We call the criterion the gap-com statistic (gap community statistic). The idea of the gap-com statistic is to examine the difference between the observed and the expected counts of communities (clusters) where the expected counts are evaluated using either data permutations or reference graph (the Erdős-Rényi graph) resampling. The latter represents a trivial gene network structure determined by chance. We put emphasis on complex network inference because the structure of gene networks is usually nontrivial. For example, some of the genes can be clustered together or some genes can be hub genes. We evaluate the performance of the gap-com statistic in graphical model selection and compare its performance to some existing methods using simulated and real biological data examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.