ArticlePloS one2022
An improved X-means and isolation forest based methodology for network traffic anomaly detection.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anomaly detection in network traffic is becoming a challenging task due to the complexity of large-scale networks and the proliferation of various social network applications. In the actual industrial environment, only recently obtained unlabelled data can be used as the training set. The accuracy of the abnormal ratio in the training set as prior knowledge has a great influence on the performance of the commonly used unsupervised algorithms. In this study, an anomaly detection algorithm based on X-means and iForest is proposed, named X-iForest, which clusters the standard Euclidean distance between the abnormal points and the normal cluster centre to achieve secondary filtering by using X-means. We compared X-iForest with seven mainstream unsupervised algorithms in terms of the AUC and anomaly detection rates. A large number of experiments showed that X-iForest has notable advantages over other algorithms and can be well applied to anomaly detection of large-scale network traffic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.