Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35100069›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2022

The Impact of Feedback on Perceptual Decision-Making and Metacognition: Reduction in Bias but No Change in Sensitivity.

Nadia Haddara, Dobromir Rahnev

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Towards an integrative neuroscience of metacognition.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Confidence in naturalistic decision making.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Repeated Feedback Can Benefit Seven-Year-old's Uncertainty Monitoring in a Memory Task.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nadia HaddaraSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Dobromir RahnevSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Uncovering the Architecture of MetacognitionR01MH119189 · NIMH · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI RAHNEV, DOBROMIR · 2020 to 2024
$1.5M
Uncovering the Architecture of MetacognitionR56MH119189 · NIMH · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI RAHNEV, DOBROMIR · 2019 to 2019
$334k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH119189NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH119189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely believed that feedback improves behavior, but the mechanisms behind this improvement remain unclear. Different theories postulate that feedback has either a direct effect on performance through automatic reinforcement mechanisms or only an indirect effect mediated by a deliberate change in strategy. To adjudicate between these competing accounts, we performed two large experiments on human adults (total

Indexed as

MetacognitionAdultDecision MakingFeedbackHumansbiasconfidence calibrationcriterionmetacognitionopen dataopen materialsperceptual decision-makingpreregisteredsensitivity

Identifiers

PMID35100069
PMCPMC9096460
OpenAlexW4226225500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.