Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35099778›Full record

SynthesisReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2022

The Impact of Oocyte Vitrification on Offspring: a Systematic Review.

Caroline M Da Luz, Marília A Caetano, Thalita S Berteli, Alessandra A Vireque, Paula A Navarro

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Elective Egg Freezing for Non-Medical Reasons (Scientific Impact Paper No. 63, 2026 Second Edition).BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline M Da LuzDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Human Reproduction, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Avenue, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6733-8266
Marília A CaetanoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Human Reproduction, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Avenue, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5257-452X
Thalita S BerteliDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Human Reproduction, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Avenue, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5445-0053
Alessandra A VirequeInvitra, Assisted Reproductive Technologies LTDA, Supera Innovation and Technology Park, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2597-531X
Paula A NavarroDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Human Reproduction, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Avenue, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil. drapaulanavarro@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2368-4188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oocyte vitrification is a widespread and well-established assisted reproduction technique that has enabled some patient groups to obtain clinical results equivalent to those using fresh oocytes. However, as the number of babies born from vitrified oocytes has increased, so has the discussion regarding the method's safety for the offspring. Cryogenic oocyte damage caused by chemical, mechanical, and thermal stress has raised concern. In this systematic review, we asked the question of whether oocyte vitrification impacts offspring health. From 2007 to 2021, 13 studies were included in the analysis. All studies were observational and presented neonatal outcomes. A total of 4,159 babies were analyzed. Data from these studies were used to assess the following outcomes: multiple pregnancies, cesarean section, gestational age at delivery, the number of live births, birth weight, Apgar scores, congenital anomalies, and baby health. The most extended follow-ups evaluated children until 1, 2, and 6 years of age. According to the evidence appraised in this systematic review, vitrification seems to be a safe method for oocyte cryopreservation and child health, at least in the short term. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need for additional long-term data results from big databases and also for randomized controlled trials to improve the levels of evidence.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferVitrificationCesarean SectionCryopreservationFemaleHumansOocytesPregnancyPregnancy RateAssisted reproductionOffspringOocytePerinatal outcomesVitrification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.