Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35099768›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2022

Brain-Computer Interface: Applications to Speech Decoding and Synthesis to Augment Communication.

Shiyu Luo, Qinwan Rabbani, Nathan E Crone

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shiyu LuoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. sluo15@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1650-9250
Qinwan RabbaniDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nathan E CroneDepartment of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Investigation of the Cortical Communication (CORTICOM) SystemUH3NS114439 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CRONE, NATHAN E, RAMSEY, NICOLAS FRANCISCUS · 2020 to 2025
$6.6M
Brain-Computer Interface Implant for Severe Communication DisabilityU01DC016686 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT · PI CRONE, NATHAN E, RAMSEY, NICOLAS FRANCISCUS · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC016686NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS114439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage or degeneration of motor pathways necessary for speech and other movements, as in brainstem strokes or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), can interfere with efficient communication without affecting brain structures responsible for language or cognition. In the worst-case scenario, this can result in the locked in syndrome (LIS), a condition in which individuals cannot initiate communication and can only express themselves by answering yes/no questions with eye blinks or other rudimentary movements. Existing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices that rely on eye tracking can improve the quality of life for people with this condition, but brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are also increasingly being investigated as AAC devices, particularly when eye tracking is too slow or unreliable. Moreover, with recent and ongoing advances in machine learning and neural recording technologies, BCIs may offer the only means to go beyond cursor control and text generation on a computer, to allow real-time synthesis of speech, which would arguably offer the most efficient and expressive channel for communication. The potential for BCI speech synthesis has only recently been realized because of seminal studies of the neuroanatomical and neurophysiological underpinnings of speech production using intracranial electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. These studies have shown that cortical areas responsible for vocalization and articulation are distributed over a large area of ventral sensorimotor cortex, and that it is possible to decode speech and reconstruct its acoustics from ECoG if these areas are recorded with sufficiently dense and comprehensive electrode arrays. In this article, we review these advances, including the latest neural decoding strategies that range from deep learning models to the direct concatenation of speech units. We also discuss state-of-the-art vocoders that are integral in constructing natural-sounding audio waveforms for speech BCIs. Finally, this review outlines some of the challenges ahead in directly synthesizing speech for patients with LIS.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesCommunicationElectrocorticographyHumansQuality of LifeSpeechBrain-computer interfaceECoGElectrocorticographyLocked-in syndromeSpeech synthesis

Identifiers

PMID35099768
PMCPMC9130409
OpenAlexW4210261408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.