Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35099758›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2022

Staging Disease Severity Using the Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS): A Retrospective Data Analysis.

Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared, Katherine Houghton, Quanwu Zhang, Josephine Mauskopf, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06639282 (SIPO1-AD), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06639282 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

SIPO1-AD: A Phase II Clinical Trial for the Assessment of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Siponimod in Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, PhoenixRan2025 to 2029Enrolled105ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, Mild Alzheimer Disease, MCI With Increased Risk for Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Impairment, MildArmsSiponimod, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amir Abbas Tahami MonfaredEisai Inc., 200 Metro Blvd, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA. amir_tahami@eisai.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4003-3192
Katherine HoughtonHealth Economics, RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK.
Quanwu ZhangEisai Inc., 200 Metro Blvd, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA.
Josephine MauskopfHealth Economics, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Alzheimer's disease (AD) composite score (ADCOMS) has been shown to be a more sensitive measure of cognitive change in early AD (i.e., mild cognitive impairment [MCI] and mild AD) than commonly used measures. This study derived ADCOMS value ranges associated with different disease severity stages across the predementia and AD continuum.

methodsData from patients enrolled in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative were assessed at baseline and month 24. Data were randomly split into derivation and validation samples. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves of ADCOMS values were generated in the derivation sample to assess the sensitivity and specificity of ADCOMS cutoff values compared with existing disease severity cutoff scores using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) global, CDR Sum of Boxes, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale, and Mini-Mental State Examination. Optimal ADCOMS cutoff values for each disease stage were compared between the derivation and the validation samples using a χ

resultsThe following ADCOMS value ranges for the total population and Aβ + population were identified: < 0.29 indicative of normal cognition, 0.29 to < 0.45 indicative of MCI, 0.45-0.77 indicative of mild AD, and > 0.77 indicative of at least moderate AD. The reliability of these ADCOMS value ranges was supported by diagnostic accuracy tests and tests indicating no significant difference in the ROC curves between the derivation and validation samples.

conclusionADCOMS values ranges can be used to assess the severity of cognitive decline. The derived severity threshold score ranges for ADCOMS will enable its use as an endpoint in clinical trials assessing disease progression and clinical outcomes of disease-modifying therapies in persons with MCI or early AD, including patients with Aβ + confirmation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer diseaseCognitive dysfunctionProgressionROC curveSeverity

Identifiers

PMID35099758
PMCPMC8857364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.