ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022
Computational and image processing methods for analysis and automation of anatomical alignment and joint spacing in reconstructive surgery.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of 3D printed medical implant design.3D printing in medicine · 2026Article
- On the Search for Potentially Anomalous Traces of Cosmic Ray Particles in Images Acquired by Cmos Detectors for a Continuous Stream of Emerging Observational Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeReconstructive surgeries to treat a number of musculoskeletal conditions, from arthritis to severe trauma, involve implant placement and reconstructive planning components. Anatomically matched 3D-printed implants are becoming increasingly patient-specific; however, the preoperative planning and design process requires several hours of manual effort from highly trained engineers and clinicians. Our work mitigates this problem by proposing algorithms for the automatic re-alignment of unhealthy anatomies, leading to more efficient, affordable, and scalable treatment solutions.
methodsOur solution combines global alignment techniques such as iterative closest points with novel joint space refinement algorithms. The latter is achieved by a low-dimensional characterization of the joint space, computed from the distribution of the distance between adjacent points in a joint.
resultsExperimental validation is presented on real clinical data from human subjects. Compared with ground truth healthy anatomies, our algorithms can reduce misalignment errors by 22% in translation and 19% in rotation for the full foot-and-ankle and 37% in translation and 39% in rotation for the hindfoot only, achieving a performance comparable to expert technicians.
conclusionOur methods and histogram-based metric allow for automatic and unsupervised alignment of anatomies along with techniques for global alignment of complex arrangements such as the foot-and-ankle system, a major step toward a fully automated and data-driven re-positioning, designing, and diagnosing tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35099684What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.