Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35099642›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2023

Drip-and-ship toward mothership model for mechanical thrombectomy during COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective analysis.

Matteo Paolucci, Sara Biguzzi, Francesco Cordici, Michele Romoli, Mattia Altini, Vanni Agnoletti, Andrea Fabbri, Raffaella Francesconi, Maurizio Menarini, Tiziana Perin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matteo PaolucciNeurology Unit, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti, 286, Cesena, 47521, FC, Italy. matteo.paolucci@auslromagna.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-378X
Sara BiguzziNeurology Unit, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti, 286, Cesena, 47521, FC, Italy.
Francesco CordiciNeurology Unit, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti, 286, Cesena, 47521, FC, Italy.
Michele RomoliNeurology Unit, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti, 286, Cesena, 47521, FC, Italy.
Mattia AltiniMedical Direction, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy.
Vanni AgnolettiIntensive Care Unit, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, FC, Italy.
Andrea FabbriEmergency Department, "Morgagni-Pierantoni" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, FC, Italy.
Raffaella FrancesconiEmergency Department, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, FC, Italy.
Maurizio MenariniCentrale Operativa 118 Romagna E Emergenza Territoriale Della Provincia Di Ravenna, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy.
Tiziana PerinEmergency Department, "Infermi" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, RN, Italy.
Maria RuggieroNeuroradiology Unit, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, FC, Italy.
Marco LongoniNeurology Unit, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti, 286, Cesena, 47521, FC, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2020, our stroke network shifted from a drip-and-ship strategy (transport of acute ischemic stroke patients to the nearest primary stroke centers) toward a mothership model (direct transportation to the Comprehensive Stroke Center). We retrospectively analyzed stroke network performances comparing the two models. PATIENTS AND

methodsAll spoke-district patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) between 15th March-15th June 2019 (drip-and-ship) and 2020 (mothership) were considered. We compared onset-to-groin time (OGT) and onset-to-needle time (ONT) between the two periods. Secondarily, we investigated other performances parameters (percentage of IV thrombolysis, timing of diagnostic and treatment) and clinical outcome (3-month modified Rankin Scale).

resultsTwenty-four spoke-district patients in 2019 (drip-and-ship) and 26 in 2020 (mothership) underwent EVT. The groups did not differ for age, sex, risk factors, pre-stroke mRS 0-1, NIHSS, and ASPECTS distribution. The MS model showed a significant decrease of the OGT (162.5 min vs 269 min, p = 0.001) without significantly affecting the ONT (140.5 min vs 136 min, p = 0.853), ensuring a higher number of IV thrombolysis in combination with EVT (p = 0.030). The mothership model showed longer call-to-door time (median + 23 min, p < 0.005), but shorter door-to-needle (median - 31 min, p = 0.001), and door-to-groin time (- 82.5 min, p < 0.001). We found no effects of the stroke network model on the 3-month mRS (ordinal shift analysis, p = 0.753).

conclusionsThe shift to the mothership model during the COVID-19 pandemic guaranteed quicker EVT without significantly delaying IVT.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaCOVID-19Endovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyThrombolytic TherapyTreatment OutcomeFibrinolytic therapyStroke network modelThrombectomyThrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID35099642
PMCPMC8802255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.