Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35099621›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2022

Use of personal protective equipment by European Radiologists during the COVID-19 pandemic, a survey of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS).

Miraude Eapm Adriaensen, Danoob Dalili, Hildo Lamb, Paolo Ricci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miraude Eapm AdriaensenUEMS Section of Radiology - Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Danoob DaliliDepartment of Radiology, Epsom and St Helier's University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom, KT18 7EG, Surrey, UK.
Hildo LambUEMS Section of Radiology - Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Paolo RicciUEMS Section of Radiology - Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto 1, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00168, Rome, Italy. paolo.ricci@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5212-0678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current global pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has profoundly impacted medical practitioners worldwide. This survey was formed by the Radiology Section of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) to establish the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) by European radiologists committed to providing face-to-face ultrasound services after the first few months of the COVID-19 global pandemic.

resultsThe results showed a heterogeneous picture within Europe regarding PPE used by European radiologists providing face-to-face ultrasound services. Ranging from full protection including full limb protection and double gloves to no PPE at all. In general, European radiologists were using more PPE when providing face-to-face ultrasound services in COVID-19 positive patients than in COVID-19 asymptomatic patients. In many member countries of the Radiology Section of the UEMS (19/30), there were no national guidelines with regard to the use of PPE by healthcare professionals committed to providing face-to-face ultrasound services.

conclusionsOur results showed that harmonization on a European level regarding the recommended use of PPE for European radiologists providing face-to-face ultrasound services is lacking. When the position statements and best practice recommendations on standards in ultrasound are revised, we recommend adding a paragraph on PPE.

Indexed as

COVID-19Personal protective equipmentUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID35099621
PMCPMC8802262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.