ArticleEuropean radiology2022
Diagnostic Accuracy of 2-[
Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved Detection of Bone Metastases in Children and Young Adults with Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2023Trial
- Whole-Body MRI VersusCancers · 2026Article
- Bone marrow metastasis from gastric cancer: A case report.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Comparing Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MRI to Conventional Imaging: Staging Pediatric Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
- Melanin-targeted [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Head-to-Head Comparison between FDG andDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Detection of bone marrow metastases in children and young adults with solid cancers with diffusion-weighted MRI.Skeletal radiology · 2023Article
- Comparison of whole-body DW-MRI with 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Ferumoxytol-Enhanced MRI in Children and Young Adults: State of the Art.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2-[
methodsIn this cross-sectional single-center institutional review board-approved study, we investigated twenty-three children and young adults (mean age, 16.8 years ± 5.1 [standard deviation]; age range, 7-25 years; 16 males, 7 females) with 925 bone marrow metastases who underwent 66 simultaneous 2-[
resultsThe reviewers detected 884 (884/925, 95.5%) bone marrow metastases on 2-[
conclusionsBoth 2-[ KEY POINTS: • DW-MRI and 2-[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.