Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35099591›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2022

Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Maximilian Fleischmann, Sebastian Scholl, Jochen J Frietsch, Inken Hilgendorf, Karin Schrenk, Jakob Hammersen, Florian Prims, Christian Thiede, Andreas Hochhaus, Ulf Schnetzke

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maximilian FleischmannKlinik Für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung Für Hämatologie Und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Sebastian SchollKlinik Für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung Für Hämatologie Und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Jochen J FrietschKlinik Für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung Für Hämatologie Und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Inken HilgendorfKlinik Für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung Für Hämatologie Und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Karin SchrenkKlinik Für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung Für Hämatologie Und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Jakob HammersenKlinik Für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung Für Hämatologie Und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Florian PrimsKlinik Für Innere Medizin, Abteilung Für Hämatologie Und Onkologie, SRH Klinikum Burgenlandkreis Naumburg, Naumburg, Germany.
Christian ThiedeMedizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Andreas HochhausKlinik Für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung Für Hämatologie Und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Ulf SchnetzkeKlinik Für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung Für Hämatologie Und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. ulf.schnetzke@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7455-8988
Jena University Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcome in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, approval of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypo-methylating agents (HMA) led to a significant improvement of response rates and survival. Further, application in the relapsed or refractory (r/r) AML setting or in context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) seems feasible. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Fifty-six consecutive adult AML patients on VEN from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients received VEN either as first-line treatment, as subsequent therapy (r/r AML excluding prior alloHSCT), or at relapse after alloHSCT. VEN was administered orally in 28-day cycles either combined with HMA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC).

resultsAfter a median follow-up of 11.5 (range 6.1-22.3) months, median overall survival (OS) from start of VEN treatment was 13.3 (2.2-20.5) months, 5.0 (0.8-24.3) months and 4.0 (1.5-22.1) months for first-line, subsequent line treatment and at relapse post-alloHSCT, respectively. Median OS was 11.5 (10-22.3) months from start of VEN when subsequent alloHSCT was carried out. Relapse-free survival (RFS) for the total cohort was 10.2 (2.2 - 24.3) months. Overall response rate (composite complete remission + partial remission) was 51.8% for the total cohort (61.1% for VEN first-line treatment, 52.2% for subsequent line and 42.8% at relapse post-alloHSCT). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly reduced median OS in FLT3-ITD mutated AML with 3.4 (1.9-4.9) months versus 10.4 (0.8-24.3) months for non-mutated cases, (HR 4.45, 95% CI 0.89-22.13, p = 0.0002). Patients harboring NPM1 or IDH1/2 mutations lacking co-occurrence of FLT3-ITD showed a survival advantage over patients without those mutations (11.2 (5-24.3) months versus 5.0 (0.8-22.1) months, respectively, (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23 - 1.21, p = 0.131). Multivariate analysis revealed mutated NPM1 as a significant prognostic variable for achieving complete remission (CR) (HR 19.14, 95% CI 2.30 - 436.2, p < 0.05). The most common adverse events were hematological, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 44.6% and 14.5% of patients, respectively.

conclusionDetailed analyses on efficacy for common clinical scenarios, such as first-line treatment, subsequent therapy (r/r AML), and application prior to and post-alloHSCT, are presented. The findings suggest VEN treatment combinations efficacious not only in first-line setting but also in r/r AML. Furthermore, VEN might play a role in a subgroup of patients with failure to conventional chemotherapy as a salvage regimen aiming for potential curative alloHSCT.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdultAgedBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCytarabineHumansNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Retrospective StudiesSulfonamidesBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCytarabineNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2SulfonamidesvenetoclaxAMLHypo-methylating agentsRefractoryRelapseSalvage therapyVenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID35099591
PMCPMC9508061
OpenAlexW4221058111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.