Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35099577›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2022

Bibliometric analysis and visualization of research trends on oblique lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

Guang-Xun Lin, Jin-Niang Nan, Kuo-Tai Chen, Li-Wei Sun, Ching-Ting Tai, Shang-Wun Jhang, Chien-Min Chen, Gang Rui, Bao-Shan Hu

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Guang-Xun LinDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Jin-Niang NanDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China.
Kuo-Tai ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Li-Wei SunDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Ching-Ting TaiDepartment of Family Medicine, Lukang Christian Hospital, Lukang, Taiwan.
Shang-Wun JhangDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chien-Min Chen *Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan. xmhbs@21cn.com.
Gang Rui *Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China. reigang@163.com.
Bao-Shan Hu *Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China. 96015@cch.org.tw.
Changhua Christian Hospital · TWFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University · CNChiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2021J05282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine trends and hot subjects in the field of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) research during the last decade using bibliometric analysis and visualization tools, in order to assist researchers in exploring new directions for future research in that field.

methodsArticles published from January 1, 2012, to August 15, 2021, were screened in the Web of Science database. The data were analyzed with CiteSpace software, which generated visualization knowledge maps. All literature was assessed for the following parameters: the number of total publications, distribution, h-index, institutions, journals, authors, co-occurrence state, and research hotspots.

resultsA total of 173 articles were identified. The country with the largest number of articles was China (41.04%), followed by South Korea (20.81%), the USA (15.61%), Japan (9.83%), and Thailand (2.89%). South Korea and the USA had the highest h-index (9), followed by China (8), Japan (7), and Thailand (2). Catholic University of Korea was the organization that produced the most literature. World Neurosurgery published the most papers about OLIF (12.50%), but articles in Spine were most frequently cited (151). Kim JS was the most productive author, whereas Silvestre C was the most cited author. The main research hotspots are anatomy, discectomy, approach, injure, and diseases.

conclusionsThe number of publications in the field of OLIF has increased considerably in recent years. The USA, China, South Korea, and Japan have made substantial contributions to this field. Anatomy, complications, decompression surgery, and application in various degenerative lumbar diseases have been the research hotspots in recent years.

Indexed as

BibliometricsPublicationsHumansLumbosacral RegionNeurosurgical ProceduresSpineBibliometric analysisOblique lumbar interbody fusionResearch productivityResearch trendsVisualization

Identifiers

PMID35099577
OpenAlexW4210653111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.