Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35099572›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022

Deep learning-based artificial intelligence for prostate cancer detection at biparametric MRI.

Sherif Mehralivand, Dong Yang, Stephanie A Harmon, Daguang Xu, Ziyue Xu, Holger Roth, Samira Masoudi, Deepak Kesani, Nathan Lay, Maria J Merino and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. IR-GPT: AI Foundation Models to Optimize Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sherif MehralivandMolecular Imaging Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Dong YangNVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Stephanie A HarmonMolecular Imaging Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Daguang XuNVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Ziyue XuNVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Holger RothNVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Samira MasoudiMolecular Imaging Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Deepak KesaniMolecular Imaging Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Nathan LayMolecular Imaging Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Maria J MerinoLaboratory of Pathology, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Bradford J WoodCenter for Interventional Oncology, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Peter A PintoUrologic Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Baris TurkbeyMolecular Imaging Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. turkbeyi@mail.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-6494
National Institutes of Health · USNvidia (United States) · USCenter for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Prostate Cancer ImagingZIABC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$49.2M
Center for Interventional OncologyZIDBC011242 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WOOD, BRADFORD J · 2009 to 2025
$18.7M
Prostate SectionZIABC011081 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PINTO, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$15.2M
CCR Artificial Intelligence ResourceZIHBC012032 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI TÜRKBEY, BARIS · 2021 to 2025
$10.1M
Translational Surgical PathologyZIESC000853 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI MERINO, MARIA · 2009 to 2025
$4.3M
Prostate Cancer ImagingZ01BC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2005 to 2008
$2.1M
Imaging, image guided biopsy and treatment of prostate cancerZIABC012062 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI TÜRKBEY, BARIS · 2021 to 2025
$1.3M
Interventional OncologyZIACL040015 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI WOOD, BRADFORD · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Navigation Tools for Image Guided Minimally invasive TherapiesZIACL040011 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI WOOD, BRADFORD · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010655Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011081Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC012062Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CL040015Intramural NIH HHS ZID BC011242Intramural NIH HHS ZIE SC000853Intramural NIH HHS ZIH BC012032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo present fully automated DL-based prostate cancer detection system for prostate MRI.

methodsMRI scans from two institutions, were used for algorithm training, validation, testing. MRI-visible lesions were contoured by an experienced radiologist. All lesions were biopsied using MRI-TRUS-guidance. Lesions masks, histopathological results were used as ground truth labels to train UNet, AH-Net architectures for prostate cancer lesion detection, segmentation. Algorithm was trained to detect any prostate cancer ≥ ISUP1. Detection sensitivity, positive predictive values, mean number of false positive lesions per patient were used as performance metrics.

results525 patients were included for training, validation, testing of the algorithm. Dataset was split into training (n = 368, 70%), validation (n = 79, 15%), test (n = 78, 15%) cohorts. Dice coefficients in training, validation sets were 0.403, 0.307, respectively, for AHNet model compared to 0.372, 0.287, respectively, for UNet model. In validation set, detection sensitivity was 70.9%, PPV was 35.5%, mean number of false positive lesions/patient was 1.41 (range 0-6) for UNet model compared to 74.4% detection sensitivity, 47.8% PPV, mean number of false positive lesions/patient was 0.87 (range 0-5) for AHNet model. In test set, detection sensitivity for UNet was 72.8% compared to 63.0% for AHNet, mean number of false positive lesions/patient was 1.90 (range 0-7), 1.40 (range 0-6) in UNet, AHNet models, respectively.

conclusionWe developed a DL-based AI approach which predicts prostate cancer lesions at biparametric MRI with reasonable performance metrics. While false positive lesion calls remain as a challenge of AI-assisted detection algorithms, this system can be utilized as an adjunct tool by radiologists.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProstatic NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstateArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35099572
PMCPMC10506420
OpenAlexW4210398301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.