ArticlePediatric cardiology2022
Home High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Children with Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Safety of Home High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Children with Congenital Heart Disease and Miscellaneous Respiratory Problems.Pediatric cardiology · 2022Article
- Home HFNC in Children with Heart Disease: Is It Safe?Pediatric cardiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy has been applied in the perioperative respiratory care for children with congenital heart disease and respiratory problems. However, the information about the feasibility of home HFNC therapy remains lacking among them. We retrospectively reviewed 5 children with congenital heart disease and respiratory problems who underwent home HFNC therapy, and evaluated their feasibility and safety. Age and weight at the introduction of home HFNC therapy were 19 (2-119) months and 5.3 (3.1-11.4) kg, respectively. All subjects had chromosomal anomaly including trisomy 18 in 3 and trisomy 21 in 2 subjects. Cardiac diagnoses included ventricular septal defect in 3, tetralogy of Fallot with complete atrioventricular septal defect in one, and pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect in another subject. Other comorbidities involved pulmonary hypertension in 4, micrognathia in 4, West syndrome in one, and bronchial asthma in one subject. Respiratory manifestations involved cyanosis due to upper airway obstruction in 2 and central hypopnea in 2, and recurrent pneumonia in one subject. After home HFNC therapy, systemic oxygen saturation significantly increased from 60 (40-78)% to 83 (83-96)% (P = 0.04), while heart rate and blood partial pressure of carbon dioxide were significantly decreased. There was no adverse event relevant to home HFNC during the follow-up period of 12 (5-49) months. Among them, one patient subsequently underwent tracheotomy at 11 years of age, and two patients weaned to conventional home oxygen therapy at 7 and 23 months of age. Home HFNC is safe and feasible in children with congenital heart disease and respiratory problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.