ArticleJAMA network open2022
Validation of Revised International Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Surveillance Network Diagnostic Criteria for Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prion disease mimicking rapidly progressive Alzheimer disease: case series and systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Probable Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Presenting as Rapidly Progressive Dementia: A Case Report From Georgia.Cureus · 2026Article
- Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a multidimensional review from epidemiology to treatment and prognosis.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Enhanced Sensitivity of a Modified Quaking-Induced Conversion Diagnostic Test for the Broad Detection of Sporadic and Inherited Prion Diseases: A Retrospective Study.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Article
- When Thiamine Is Not the Answer: Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Mimicking Wernicke's Encephalopathy.Cureus · 2026Article
- Review
- Response to CNP-D-25-204 "Triphasic waves: To treat or not to treat?": Do not overlook COVID-19 and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Challenges in Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease: A Case Report of an Atypical Presentation.Cureus · 2025Article
- The comparative analysis between sporadic and genetic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in China.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Article
- Mood Alterations in the Prodromal Phase of Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease.JAMA neurology · 2025Article
- Biological Fluid Biomarkers in Human Prion Diseases with a Note on Biosafety.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Seed Amplification Assays as Powerful Tools for Detecting Peripheral Biomarkers in Prion-Like Diseases.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease mimicking Hashimoto's encephalopathy: steroid response followed by decline.Open life sciences · 2025Article
- Advancing Prion Diagnostics: RT-QuIC Applications in Peripheral Tissues.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Interpretable deep learning survival predictions in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Understanding the Best Nutritional Management for Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Patients: A Comparison Between East Asian and Western Experiences.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Improving protocols for α-synuclein seed amplification assays: analysis of preanalytical and analytical variables and identification of candidate parameters for seed quantification.Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) is a rapidly lethal disease. Rapid, accurate diagnosis is imperative for epidemiological surveillance and public health activities to exclude treatable differentials and facilitate supportive care. In 2017, the International CJD Surveillance Network diagnostic criteria were revised to incorporate cortical ribboning on magnetic resonance imaging and the real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assay, developments that require multicenter evaluation. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of revised diagnostic criteria through the retrospective diagnosis of autopsy-confirmed cases (referred to as in-life diagnosis). Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study used a 3-year clinicopathological series using all cases of autopsy-confirmed sCJD and a noncase group with alternative neuropathological diagnoses from national surveillance centers in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Italy. Data were collected from January 2017 to December 2019 and analyzed from January 2020 to November 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity and specificity of revised diagnostic criteria and diagnostic investigations. Secondary analyses assessing sCJD subgroups by genotype, pathological classification, disease duration, and age. Results: A total of 501 sCJD cases and 146 noncases were included. Noncase diagnoses included neurodegenerative diseases, autoimmune encephalitis, and cerebral insults such as anoxia. Participants in the sCJD cases cohort were younger (mean [SD] age, 68.8 [9.8] years vs 72.8 [10.9] years; P < .001) and had longer median (IQR) disease duration (118 [74.8-222.3] days vs 85 [51.5-205.5] days; P = .002); sex ratios were equivalent (253 [50.5%] male cases vs 74 [50.7%] male noncases). Sensitivity of revised criteria in in-life diagnosis (450 of 488 [92.2%] diagnoses; 95% CI, 89.5%-94.4%) was increased compared with prior criteria (378 of 488 [77.5%] diagnoses; 95% CI, 73.5%-81.1%; P < .001), while specificity (101 of 125 [80.8%] diagnoses; 95% CI, 72.8%-87.3%) was unchanged (102 of 125 [81.6%] diagnoses; 95% CI, 73.7%-88.0%; P > .99). Among 223 cases and 52 noncases with the full panel of investigations performed, sensitivity of revised criteria (97.8%; 95% CI, 94.9%-99.3%) was increased compared with prior criteria (76.2%; 95% CI, 70.1%-81.7%; P < .001) while specificity was unchanged (67.3%; 95% CI, 52.9%-79.7% vs 69.2%; 95% CI, 54.9%-81.3%; P > .99). In 455 cases and 111 noncases, cortical ribboning was 67.9% sensitive (95% CI, 63.4%-72.2%) and 86.5% specific (95% CI, 78.7%-92.2%). In 274 cases and 77 noncases, RT-QuIC was 91.6% sensitive (95% CI, 87.7%-94.6%) and 100% specific (95% CI, 96.2%-100%). Investigation sensitivity varied with genetic and pathological features, disease duration, and age. Conclusions and Relevance: This diagnostic study demonstrated significantly improved sensitivity of revised sCJD diagnostic criteria with unaltered specificity. The revision has enhanced diagnostic accuracy for clinical care and surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.