Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35099205›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2022

Electronic bridge to mental health for college students: A randomized controlled intervention trial.

Cheryl A King, Daniel Eisenberg, Jacqueline Pistorello, William Coryell, Ronald C Albucher, Todd Favorite, Adam Horwitz, Erin E Bonar, Daniel Epstein, Kai Zheng

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A latent profile analysis of at-risk first-year undergraduate students.Journal of American college health : J of ACH · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cheryl A KingDepartment of Psychiatry.ORCID 0000-0002-9903-6278
Daniel EisenbergDepartment of Health Management and Policy.
Jacqueline PistorelloUniversity of Nevada, Reno.ORCID 0000-0002-3926-5474
William CoryellDepartment of Psychiatry.
Ronald C AlbucherCounseling and Psychological Services.ORCID 0000-0003-3889-3839
Todd FavoriteDepartment of Psychiatry.
Adam HorwitzDepartment of Psychiatry.ORCID 0000-0002-6087-7950
Erin E BonarDepartment of Psychiatry.
Daniel EpsteinDepartment of Psychiatry.ORCID 0000-0002-4944-5401
Kai ZhengDepartment of Informatics.ORCID 0000-0003-4121-4948

Funding

Electronic Bridge to Mental Health (eBridge) for College StudentsR01MH103244 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KING, CHERYL A. · 2014 to 2018
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSuicide is the second leading cause of death among college students in the United States, and the percentage of students reporting suicidal thoughts is increasing. Nevertheless, many students at risk do not seek mental health (MH) services. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) examined the efficacy of Electronic Bridge to Mental Health for College Students (eBridge) for increasing at-risk students' linkage to MH services.

methodStudents from four universities were recruited via email; 40,347 (22.6%) completed the online suicide risk screen; and 3,363 (8.3%) met criteria for randomization based on suicide risk factors and lack of current treatment (62.2% female, 35.0% male, 2.8% transgender/nonbinary; 73.2% White, 7.0% Black, 19.9% Asian, 11.7% other; 12.4% Hispanic, 76.2% undergraduate). These students were randomized to eBridge [personalized feedback (PF) with option of online counseling] or Control (PF). The primary outcome was linkage to MH services within 6 months.

resultsAmong students assigned to eBridge, 355 students (21.0%) posted ≥1 message, and 168 (10.0%) posted ≥2 messages to the counselor. In intent-to-treat analyses, there was no eBridge effect on obtaining MH services. However, within the eBridge group, students who posted ≥1 message were significantly more likely to link to MH services.

conclusionseBridge shows promise for reaching a relatively small subset of college students at risk for suicide; however, engagement in eBridge was low. This study underscores the urgent need for more effective strategies to engage young adults in online mental health interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Mental HealthMental Health ServicesElectronicsFemaleHumansMaleStudentsUnited StatesUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35099205
PMCPMC11443499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.