Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35099128›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2022

Elevated microsatellite instability at selected tetranucleotide (EMAST) repeats in gastric cancer: a distinct microsatellite instability type with potential clinical impact?

Anna-Lina Herz, Sarah Wisser, Meike Kohlruss, Julia Slotta-Huspenina, Moritz Jesinghaus, Bianca Grosser, Katja Steiger, Alexander Novotny, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Thomas Schmidt and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Low microsatellite instability revisited: a review.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  2. Low microsatellite instability: A distinct instability type in gastric cancer?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anna-Lina HerzInstitute of Pathology, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sarah WisserInstitute of Pathology, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Meike KohlrussInstitute of Pathology, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julia Slotta-HuspeninaInstitute of Pathology, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Moritz JesinghausInstitute of Pathology, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-5661
Bianca GrosserInstitute of Pathology, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4957-4876
Katja SteigerInstitute of Pathology, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7269-5433
Alexander NovotnyDepartment of Surgery, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander HapfelmeierInstitute for AI and Informatics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas SchmidtDepartment of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias M GaidaInstitute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Wilko WeichertInstitute of Pathology, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Gisela KellerInstitute of Pathology, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2886-0371
Technical University of Munich · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the clinical impact of elevated microsatellite instability at selected tetranucleotide (EMAST) repeats in the context of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) in gastric/gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas. We analysed 583 resected tumours (272 without and 311 after CTx) and 142 tumour biopsies before CTx. If at least two or three of the five tetranucleotide repeat markers tested showed instability, the tumours were defined as EMAST (2+) or EMAST (3+), respectively. Expression of mismatch repair proteins including MSH3 was analysed using immunohistochemistry. Microsatellite instability (MSI) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity were determined using standard assays. EMAST (2+) and (3+) were detected in 17.8 and 11.5% of the tumours, respectively. The frequency of EMAST (2+) or (3+) in MSI-high (MSI-H) tumours was 96.2 or 92.5%, respectively, demonstrating a high overlap with this molecular subtype, and the association of EMAST and MSI status was significant (each overall p < 0.001). EMAST (2+ or 3+) alone in MSI-H and EBV-negative tumours demonstrated only a statistically significant association of EMAST (2+) positivity and negative lymph node status (42.3% in EMAST (2+) and 28.8% in EMAST negative, p = 0.045). EMAST alone by neither definition was significantly associated with overall survival (OS) of the patients. The median OS for EMAST (2+) patients was 40.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.4-63.6) compared with 38.7 months (95% CI 26.3-51.1) for the EMAST-negative group (p = 0.880). The median OS for EMAST (3+) patients was 46.7 months (95% CI 18.2-75.2) and 38.7 months (95% CI 26.2-51.2) for the negative group (p = 0.879). No statistically significant association with response to neoadjuvant CTx was observed (p = 0.992 and p = 0.433 for EMAST (2+) and (3+), respectively). In conclusion, our results demonstrate a nearly complete intersection between MSI-H and EMAST and they indicate that EMAST alone is not a distinct instability type associated with noticeable clinico-pathological characteristics of gastric carcinoma patients.

Indexed as

Epstein-Barr Virus InfectionsStomach NeoplasmsHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityMicrosatellite RepeatsEMASTgastric adenocarcinomamicrosatellite instabilityneoadjuvant chemotherapyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35099128
PMCPMC8977279
OpenAlexW4210399383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.