Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35099031›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2022

The epidemiology of adult fractures according to the AO/OTA fracture classification.

Onur Bilge, Zerrin Defne Dündar, Numan Atılgan, Haluk Yaka, Ahmet Fevzi Kekeç, Doğaç Karagüven, Mahmut Nedim Doral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Variability in the Orthopaedic Residency Trainee Trauma Surgical Experience.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Onur BilgeDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya-Turkey.
Zerrin Defne DündarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya-Turkey.
Numan AtılganDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya-Turkey.
Haluk YakaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya-Turkey.
Ahmet Fevzi KekeçDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya-Turkey.
Doğaç KaragüvenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara-Turkey.
Mahmut Nedim DoralDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara-Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe epidemiology of adult fractures has been changing timely, in a multifactorial fashion. The aim of this study was to put forward a recent 5-year epidemiological analysis of adult fractures, according to the current AO/OTA fracture classification, in the current decade of action for road safety.

methods5324 adult patients who were diagnosed with at least one fracture related with orthopedics and traumatology in a level-one trauma center were included in this retrospective, epidemiological descriptive study. The patients were grouped according to their ages as; 18-35, 36-55, 56-69, and ≥70. The fractures were examined according to the AO/OTA classification.

results5865 fractures were present in 5324 patients. The mean age of the patients was 48.6±21.5. The number of patients according to the age groups was as follows; 1947 (36.6%), 1636 (30.7%), 881 (16.5%), and 860 (16.2%), respectively. The most frequent three fractures according to the AO/OTA fracture classification were; 7 (hand 19.6%), 23 (distal forearm, 12.1%), and 8 (foot, 11.8%). About 54.4% and 45.4% of the patients were treated non-surgically and surgically, respectively. About 0.2% of the patients preferred an alternative treatment. Overall mortality rate was 0.4%.

conclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first analysis of adult fractures according to the AO/OTA classification, over a 5-year period. As a future prospect, further multi-centric epidemiological studies are warranted to constitute a sustainable action plan for the prevention of major traumas.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneTraumatologyAdultHumansRetrospective StudiesTrauma Centers

Identifiers

PMID35099031
PMCPMC10443149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.