Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35098921›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Crowding-induced phase separation of nuclear transport receptors in FG nucleoporin assemblies.

Luke K Davis, Ian J Ford, Bart W Hoogenboom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Single-Molecular Dissection of Liquid-Liquid Phase Transitions.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Self-regulation of the nuclear pore complex enables clogging-free crowded transport.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Surfactancy in a tadpole model of proteins.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luke K DavisDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4487-4159
Ian J FordDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bart W HoogenboomDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8882-4324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid (<1 ms) transport of biological material to and from the cell nucleus is regulated by the nuclear pore complex (NPC). At the core of the NPC is a permeability barrier consisting of intrinsically disordered phenylalanine-glycine nucleoporins (FG Nups). Various types of nuclear transport receptors (NTRs) facilitate transport by partitioning in the FG Nup assembly, overcoming the barrier by their affinity to the FG Nups, and comprise a significant fraction of proteins in the NPC barrier. In previous work (Zahn et al., 2016), we revealed a universal physical behaviour in the experimentally observed binding of two well-characterised NTRs, Nuclear Transport Factor 2 (NTF2) and the larger Importin-β (Imp-β), to different planar assemblies of FG Nups, with the binding behaviour defined by negative cooperativity. This was further validated by a minimal physical model that treated the FG Nups as flexible homopolymers and the NTRs as uniformly cohesive spheres. Here, we build upon our original study by first parametrising our model to experimental data, and next predicting the effects of crowding by different types of NTRs. We show how varying the amounts of one type of NTR modulates how the other NTR penetrates the FG Nup assembly. Notably, at similar and physiologically relevant NTR concentrations, our model predicts demixed phases of NTF2 and Imp-β within the FG Nup assembly. The functional implication of NTR phase separation is that NPCs may sustain separate transport pathways that are determined by inter-NTR competition.

Indexed as

Active Transport, Cell Nucleusbeta KaryopherinsCell NucleusGlycineHumansIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsModels, TheoreticalNuclear PoreNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsNucleocytoplasmic Transport ProteinsPhenylalaninePregnancy ProteinsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclearbeta KaryopherinsGlycineIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsNucleocytoplasmic Transport ProteinsNUTF2 protein, humanPhenylalaninePregnancy ProteinsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclearbiophysicscomputer modellingnuclear pore complexnucleocytoplasmic transportphase separationphysics of living systems

Identifiers

PMID35098921
PMCPMC8880993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.