Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35098837›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2022

A MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry-based haemoglobin chain quantification method for rapid screen of thalassaemia.

Jian Zhang, Zhizhong Liu, Ribing Chen, Qingwei Ma, Qian Lyu, Shuhui Fu, Yufei He, Zijie Xiao, Zhi Luo, Jianming Luo and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jian ZhangState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, China.
Zhizhong LiuBeijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing, China.
Ribing ChenLonggang District People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Qingwei MaBioyong Technologics Inc., Beijing, China.
Qian LyuBioyong Technologics Inc., Beijing, China.
Shuhui FuBioyong Technologics Inc., Beijing, China.
Yufei HeBioyong Technologics Inc., Beijing, China.
Zijie XiaoState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, China.
Zhi LuoState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, China.
Jianming LuoDepartment of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Xingyu WangBeijing Hypertension League Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiangyi LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Peng AnDepartment of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Wei SunState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, China.
Beijing Proteome Research Center · CNCapital Medical University · CNChina Agricultural University · CNChina Rehabilitation Research Center · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CNLonggang Central Hospital · CNShanghai Institute of Hypertension · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThalassaemia is one of the most common inherited monogenic diseases worldwide with a heavy global health burden. Considering its high prevalence in low and middle-income countries, a cheap, accurate and high-throughput screening test of thalassaemia prior to a more expensive confirmatory diagnostic test is urgently needed.

methodsIn this study, we constructed a machine learning model based on MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry quantification of haemoglobin chains in blood, and for the first time, evaluated its diagnostic efficacy in 674 thalassaemia (including both asymptomatic carriers and symptomatic patients) and control samples collected in three hospitals. Parameters related to haemoglobin imbalance (α-globin, β-globin, γ-globin, α/β and α-β) were used for feature selection before classification model construction with 8 machine learning methods in cohort 1 and further model efficiency validation in cohort 2.

resultsThe logistic regression model with 5 haemoglobin peak features achieved good classification performance in validation cohort 2 (AUC 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1, sensitivity 98.7%, specificity 95.5%). Furthermore, the logistic regression model with 6 haemoglobin peak features was also constructed to specifically identify β-thalassaemia (AUC 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97, sensitivity 96.5%, specificity 87.8% in validation cohort 2).

conclusionsFor the first time, we constructed an inexpensive, accurate and high-throughput classification model based on MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry quantification of haemoglobin chains and demonstrated its great potential in rapid screening of thalassaemia in large populations.Key messagesThalassaemia is one of the most common inherited monogenic diseases worldwide with a heavy global health burden.We constructed a machine learning model based on MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry quantification of haemoglobin chains to screen for thalassaemia.

Indexed as

beta-ThalassemiaThalassemiaHemoglobinsHeterozygoteHumansSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationHemoglobinshaemoglobinMALDI-TOFmolecular diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID35098837
PMCPMC8812805
OpenAlexW4210591263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.