Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35098619›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2022

Actions to halt biodiversity loss generally benefit the climate.

Yunne-Jai Shin, Guy F Midgley, Emma R M Archer, Almut Arneth, David K A Barnes, Lena Chan, Shizuka Hashimoto, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, Gregory Insarov, Paul Leadley and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Assessing the variability and vulnerability of carbon function in coastal soft sediment ecosystems to inform protection.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Yunne-Jai ShinMARBEC, IRD, Univ Montpellier, IFREMER, CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7259-9265
Guy F MidgleySchool for Climate Studies, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8264-0869
Emma R M ArcherDepartment of Geography, Geo-Informatics and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5374-3866
Almut ArnethAtmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
David K A BarnesBritish Antarctic Survey, NERC, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9076-7867
Lena ChanInternational Biodiversity Conservation Division, National Parks Board, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7930-7678
Shizuka HashimotoDepartment of Ecosystem Studies, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4423-9374
Ove Hoegh-GuldbergSchool of Biological Sciences and ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Gregory InsarovInstitute of Geography of the Russian Academy for Sciences, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0790-075X
Paul LeadleyLaboratoire d'Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Orsay, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8994-5507
Lisa A LevinCenter for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation and Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2858-8622
Hien T NgoOffice of Climate Change, Biodiversity and Environment, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3070-9988
Ram PanditCentre for Environmental Economics and Policy, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4053-5694
Aliny P F PiresDepartment of Ecology - IBRAG, Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1531-8831
Hans-Otto PörtnerAlfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6535-6575
Alex D RogersREV Ocean, Lysaker, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4864-2980
Robert J ScholesGlobal Change Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Josef SetteleDepartment of Conservation Biology and Social-Ecological Systems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Halle, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8624-4983
Pete SmithInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3784-1124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The two most urgent and interlinked environmental challenges humanity faces are climate change and biodiversity loss. We are entering a pivotal decade for both the international biodiversity and climate change agendas with the sharpening of ambitious strategies and targets by the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Within their respective Conventions, the biodiversity and climate interlinked challenges have largely been addressed separately. There is evidence that conservation actions that halt, slow or reverse biodiversity loss can simultaneously slow anthropogenic mediated climate change significantly. This review highlights conservation actions which have the largest potential for mitigation of climate change. We note that conservation actions have mainly synergistic benefits and few antagonistic trade-offs with climate change mitigation. Specifically, we identify direct co-benefits in 14 out of the 21 action targets of the draft post-2020 global biodiversity framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity, notwithstanding the many indirect links that can also support both biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation. These relationships are context and scale-dependent; therefore, we showcase examples of local biodiversity conservation actions that can be incentivized, guided and prioritized by global objectives and targets. The close interlinkages between biodiversity, climate change mitigation, other nature's contributions to people and good quality of life are seldom as integrated as they should be in management and policy. This review aims to re-emphasize the vital relationships between biodiversity conservation actions and climate change mitigation in a timely manner, in support to major Conferences of Parties that are about to negotiate strategic frameworks and international goals for the decades to come.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesQuality of LifeBiodiversityClimate ChangeEcosystemHumansbiodiversity conservationcarbon sequestrationclimate change mitigationconvention on biological diversitynature-based solutionsrestoration

Identifiers

PMID35098619
PMCPMC9303674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.