Trial reportMuscle & nerve2022
Phase 2B randomized controlled trial of NP001 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Pre-specified and post hoc analyses.
Trial report in Muscle & nerve, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammatory checkpoints in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: From biomarkers to therapeutic targets.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of pharmacological and biological therapies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Respiratory Function Improvement and Lifespan Extension Following Immunotherapy with NP001 Support the Concept That Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Is an Immuno-Neurologic Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Trial
- Phase 2B randomized controlled trial of NP001 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Pre-specified and post hoc analyses.Muscle & nerve · 2022Trial
- Immunotherapeutic landscape of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A bibliometric analysis of research trends, translational priorities, and collaboration networks (2006-2025).Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Cell-based immunotherapy for neurodegenerative disease: A promising avenue.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Powering Neurology Drug Development Trials to Reduce False Negative Results.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Neurodegenerative diseases and immune system: From pathogenic mechanism to therapy.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Article
- Dysbiosis and Neurodegeneration in ALS: Unraveling the Gut-Brain Axis.Neuromolecular medicine · 2025Review
- Targeting common disease pathomechanisms to treat amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
- Systemic Innate Immune System Restoration as a Therapeutic Approach for Neurodegenerative Disease: Effects of NP001 on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Progression.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- The Effectiveness of NP001 on the Long-Term Survival of Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Combination AAV therapy with galectin-1 and SOD1 downregulation demonstrates superior therapeutic effect in a severe ALS mouse model.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Article
- Review
- Development of novel treatments for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Metabolic brain disease · 2024Review
- New Insights into Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Response in Neurodegenerative Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Meta-analysis of differential gene expression in lower motor neurons isolated by laser capture microdissection from post-mortem ALS spinal cords.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: current status and future prospects.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2023Review
- From Recognition to Remedy: The Significance of Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Disease Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsALS is a heterogeneous disease that may be complicated or in part driven by inflammation. NP001, a regulator of macrophage activation, was associated with slowing disease progression in those with higher levels of the plasma inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) in phase 2A studies in ALS. Here, we evaluate the effects of NP001 in a phase 2B trial, and perform a post hoc analysis with combined data from the preceding phase 2A trial.
methodsThe phase 2B trial enrolled 138 participants within 3 y of symptom onset and with plasma hs-CRP values >1.13 mg/L. They were randomized 1:1 to receive either placebo or NP001 for 6 mo. Change from baseline ALSFRS-R scores was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included vital capacity (VC) change from baseline and percentage of participants showing no decline of ALSFRS-R score over 6 mo (non-progressor).
resultsThe phase 2B study did not show significant differences between placebo and active treatment with respect to change in ALSFRS-R scores, or VC. The drug was safe and well tolerated. A post hoc analysis identified a 40- to 65-y-old subset in which NP001-treated patients demonstrated slower declines in ALSFRS-R score by 36% and VC loss by 51% compared with placebo. A greater number of non-progressors were NP001-treated compared with placebo (p = .004). DISCUSSION: Although the phase 2B trial failed to meet its primary endpoints, post hoc analyses identified a subgroup whose decline in ALSFRS-R and VC scores were significantly slower than placebo. Further studies will be required to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.