Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35098365›Full record

ArticleOdontology2022

Correlations between additional roots in maxillary second molars, maxillary first premolars, mandibular first molars and mandibular first premolars: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography analysis.

Hakan Aydın

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hakan AydınPrivate Ballıpınar Dental Center, Çağlayan Mahallesi, Barınaklar Bulvari, 07230, Muratpaşa, Antalya, Turkey. vugas07@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3597-0843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of additional roots in maxillary second molar (MSM), maxillary first premolar (MxFP), mandibular first molar (MnFM) and mandibular first premolar (MnFP) teeth and evaluate the correlations between the number of roots for these teeth. Images of 630 Turkish patients, in which all dental groups examined in the study were present bilaterally, were analyzed using cone-beam computed tomography. The images for the presence of the fourth root in MSMs, third root in MxFPs, distolingual root in MnFMs and complicated-root structure in MnFPs were assessed and divided additional roots into subgroups. The Chi-square test was used for categorical variables such as sex and tooth position. Logistic regression analysis was performed to understand the predictor variability of other teeth in teeth with extra roots. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Prevalence of the fourth root in MSMs was 1.75%, third root in MxFPs was 6.35%, third root in MnFMs was 3.57%, and complicated root in MnFPs was 21.9%. Positive correlations were observed between MSM, MxFP and MnFP teeth for increasing root numbers (P < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between root numbers of MnFM teeth and other tooth groups (P > 0.05) In the tooth groups examined, there was at least one explanatory variable (except for the right MnFM) tooth in addition to the contralateral tooth for the presence of additional roots.

Indexed as

MolarTooth RootBicuspidCone-Beam Computed TomographyDental Pulp CavityHumansRetrospective StudiesCone-beam computed tomographyDouble palatal rootsExtra rootsRadix entomolarisThree-rooted maxillary premolar

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.