ArticleOdontology2022
Correlations between additional roots in maxillary second molars, maxillary first premolars, mandibular first molars and mandibular first premolars: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
Article in Odontology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Presence of a distolingual root in mandibular first molars as an indicator of association with other tooth canal anatomies: A systematic review.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Review
- Predictor factors of 1-rooted mandibular second molars on complicated root and canal anatomies of other mandibular teeth.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2024Article
- Predictor Mandibular Dentoalveolar Features on the Occurrence of 1-Rooted/C-Shaped Mandibular Second Molar Teeth.European endodontic journal · 2024Article
- Comparing the crown and root metric properties of double-rooted and single-rooted mandibular canine teeth.Oral radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of additional roots in maxillary second molar (MSM), maxillary first premolar (MxFP), mandibular first molar (MnFM) and mandibular first premolar (MnFP) teeth and evaluate the correlations between the number of roots for these teeth. Images of 630 Turkish patients, in which all dental groups examined in the study were present bilaterally, were analyzed using cone-beam computed tomography. The images for the presence of the fourth root in MSMs, third root in MxFPs, distolingual root in MnFMs and complicated-root structure in MnFPs were assessed and divided additional roots into subgroups. The Chi-square test was used for categorical variables such as sex and tooth position. Logistic regression analysis was performed to understand the predictor variability of other teeth in teeth with extra roots. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Prevalence of the fourth root in MSMs was 1.75%, third root in MxFPs was 6.35%, third root in MnFMs was 3.57%, and complicated root in MnFPs was 21.9%. Positive correlations were observed between MSM, MxFP and MnFP teeth for increasing root numbers (P < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between root numbers of MnFM teeth and other tooth groups (P > 0.05) In the tooth groups examined, there was at least one explanatory variable (except for the right MnFM) tooth in addition to the contralateral tooth for the presence of additional roots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35098365What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.