Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35098300›Full record

SynthesisPediatrics2022

Culturally Sensitive Interventions in Pediatric Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review.

William Okoniewski, Mangai Sundaram, Diego Chaves-Gnecco, Katie McAnany, John D Cowden, Maya Ragavan

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William OkoniewskiSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Mangai SundaramUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Diego Chaves-GneccoDivision of General Academic Pediatrics.
Katie McAnanyDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
John D CowdenDivision of General Academic Pediatrics.
Maya RagavanDivision of General Academic Pediatrics.
Children's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001856 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RAY, KRISTIN N, RUBIO, DORIS M · 2016 to 2025
$13.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextCulturally sensitive interventions in the pediatric primary care setting may help reduce health disparities. Less is known on the development of these interventions, their target groups, and their feasibility, acceptability, and impact on health outcomes.

objectiveWe conducted a systematic review to describe culturally sensitive interventions developed for the pediatric primary care setting. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycInfo (January 2000 to July 2020). STUDY SELECTION: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were (1) original research on an intervention with an evaluation, (2) within a pediatric primary care setting, (3) not limited to education for providers, (4) not limited to interpreter use, and (5) based in the United States. DATA EXTRACTION: The following were extracted: study topic, study design, intervention, cultural sensitivity strategies and terminology, setting, target group, sample size, feasibility, acceptability, and health outcomes.

resultsTwenty-five studies described 23 interventions targeting a variety of health topics. Multiple cultural sensitivity strategies were used, most commonly sociocultural (83%). Most interventions (57%) were focused on Hispanic/Latino families. Interventions were generally reported as being feasible and acceptable; some also changed health outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Small samples and heterogenous methods subject to bias were used. Relevant articles may have been missed because of the variety of terms used to describe cultural sensitivity.

conclusionsThe included articles provide preliminary evidence that culturally sensitive interventions can be feasible and effective and may help eliminate disparities for patients from communities with barriers to equitable care.

Indexed as

ChildCultural CompetencyHumansPediatricsPrimary Health CareSocial Determinants of Health

Identifiers

PMID35098300
PMCPMC9645707
OpenAlexW4210475312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.