Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35098208›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genome editing2021

Efficiency, Specificity and Temperature Sensitivity of Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs for DNA-free Genome Editing in Plants.

Raviraj Banakar, Mollie Schubert, Gavin Kurgan, Krishan Mohan Rai, Sarah F Beaudoin, Michael A Collingwood, Christopher A Vakulskas, Kan Wang, Feng Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genome editing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. RNAi and genome editing of sugarcane: Progress and prospects.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raviraj BanakarDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Mollie SchubertIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, United States.
Gavin KurganIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, United States.
Krishan Mohan RaiDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Sarah F BeaudoinIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, United States.
Michael A CollingwoodIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, United States.
Christopher A VakulskasIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, United States.
Kan WangDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Feng ZhangDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Integrated DNA Technologies (United States) · USUniversity of Minnesota · USIowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delivery of genome editing reagents using CRISPR-Cas ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) transfection offers several advantages over plasmid DNA-based delivery methods, including reduced off-target editing effects, mitigation of random integration of non-native DNA fragments, independence of vector constructions, and less regulatory restrictions. Compared to the use in animal systems, RNP-mediated genome editing is still at the early development stage in plants. In this study, we established an efficient and simplified protoplast-based genome editing platform for CRISPR-Cas RNP delivery, and then evaluated the efficiency, specificity, and temperature sensitivity of six Cas9 and Cas12a proteins. Our results demonstrated that Cas9 and Cas12a RNP delivery resulted in genome editing frequencies (8.7-41.2%) at various temperature conditions, 22°C, 26°C, and 37°C, with no significant temperature sensitivity. LbCas12a often exhibited the highest activities, while AsCas12a demonstrated higher sequence specificity. The high activities of CRISPR-Cas RNPs at 22° and 26°C, the temperature preferred by plant transformation and tissue culture, led to high mutagenesis efficiencies (34.0-85.2%) in the protoplast-regenerated calli and plants with the heritable mutants recovered in the next generation. This RNP delivery approach was further extended to pennycress (

Indexed as

Nicotiana benthamianapennycressprotoplastribonucleoproteinSetaria viridissoybeantransfectiontransformation

Identifiers

PMID35098208
PMCPMC8790294
OpenAlexW4206350232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.