Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35098177›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Microbe2022

Safety and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 ARCoV mRNA vaccine in Chinese adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial.

Gui-Ling Chen, Xiao-Feng Li, Xia-Hong Dai, Nan Li, Meng-Li Cheng, Zhen Huang, Jian Shen, Yu-Hua Ge, Zhen-Wei Shen, Yong-Qiang Deng and 21 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Microbe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Dendritic Cell-Mimicking Nanoparticles Promote mRNA Delivery to Lymphoid Organs.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Gui-Ling ChenShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Xiao-Feng LiState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xia-Hong DaiShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Nan LiShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Meng-Li ChengState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhen HuangWalvax Biotechnology, Kunming, China.
Jian ShenState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases/National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases/Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yu-Hua GeShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Zhen-Wei ShenZhejiang Shuren University Shulan International Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Yong-Qiang DengState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shu-Yuan YangWalvax Biotechnology, Kunming, China.
Hui ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Na-Na ZhangState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yi-Fei ZhangState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ling WeiSuzhou Abogen Biosciences, Suzhou, China.
Kai-Qi WuShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Meng-Fei ZhuShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Cong-Gao PengShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Qi JiangShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Shou-Chun CaoNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Yu-Hua LiNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Dan-Hua ZhaoNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Hong WuNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Ling NiInstitute for Immunology and School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Hua-Hao ShenKey Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Zhejiang Province, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Chen DongInstitute for Immunology and School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Bo YingSuzhou Abogen Biosciences, Suzhou, China.
Guo-Ping ShengShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Cheng-Feng QinState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hai-Nv GaoShulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Lan-Juan LiState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases/National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases/Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital · CNNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CNAcademy of Military Medical Sciences · CNInstitute of Microbiology · CNSuzhou Research Institute · CNBeijing Friendship Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNState Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious DiseasesTsinghua University · CNZhejiang Shuren University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafe and effective vaccines are urgently needed to end the COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to assess the preliminary safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an mRNA vaccine ARCoV, which encodes the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD).

methodsThis single centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial of ARCoV was conducted at Shulan (Hangzhou) hospital in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, China. Healthy adults aged 18-59 years negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled and randomly assigned using block randomisation to receive an intramuscular injection of vaccine or placebo. Vaccine doses were 5 μg, 10 μg, 15 μg, 20 μg, and 25 μg. The first six participants in each block were sentinels and along with the remaining 18 participants, were randomly assigned to groups (5:1). In block 1 sentinels were given the lowest vaccine dose and after a 4-day observation with confirmed safety analyses, the remaining 18 participants in the same dose group proceeded and sentinels in block 2 were given their first administration on a two-dose schedule, 28 days apart. All participants, investigators, and staff doing laboratory analyses were masked to treatment allocation. Humoral responses were assessed by measuring anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG using a standardised ELISA and neutralising antibodies using pseudovirus-based and live SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation assays. SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific T-cell responses, including IFN-γ and IL-2 production, were assessed using an enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay. The primary outcome for safety was incidence of adverse events or adverse reactions within 60 min, and at days 7, 14, and 28 after each vaccine dose. The secondary safety outcome was abnormal changes detected by laboratory tests at days 1, 4, 7, and 28 after each vaccine dose. For immunogenicity, the secondary outcome was humoral immune responses: titres of neutralising antibodies to live SARS-CoV-2, neutralising antibodies to pseudovirus, and RBD-specific IgG at baseline and 28 days after first vaccination and at days 7, 15, and 28 after second vaccination. The exploratory outcome was SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses at 7 days after the first vaccination and at days 7 and 15 after the second vaccination. This trial is registered with www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2000039212).

findingsBetween Oct 30 and Dec 2, 2020, 230 individuals were screened and 120 eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive five-dose levels of ARCoV or a placebo (20 per group). All participants received the first vaccination and 118 received the second dose. No serious adverse events were reported within 56 days after vaccination and the majority of adverse events were mild or moderate. Fever was the most common systemic adverse reaction (one [5%] of 20 in the 5 μg group, 13 [65%] of 20 in the 10 μg group, 17 [85%] of 20 in the 15 μg group, 19 [95%] of 20 in the 20 μg group, 16 [100%] of 16 in the 25 μg group; p<0·0001). The incidence of grade 3 systemic adverse events were none (0%) of 20 in the 5 μg group, three (15%) of 20 in the 10 μg group, six (30%) of 20 in the 15 μg group, seven (35%) of 20 in the 20 μg group, five (31%) of 16 in the 25 μg group, and none (0%) of 20 in the placebo group (p=0·0013). As expected, the majority of fever resolved in the first 2 days after vaccination for all groups. The incidence of solicited systemic adverse events was similar after administration of ARCoV as a first or second vaccination. Humoral immune responses including anti-RBD IgG and neutralising antibodies increased significantly 7 days after the second dose and peaked between 14 and 28 days thereafter. Specific T-cell response peaked between 7 and 14 days after full vaccination. 15 μg induced the highest titre of neutralising antibodies, which was about twofold more than the antibody titre of convalescent patients with COVID-19.

interpretationARCoV was safe and well tolerated at all five doses. The acceptable safety profile, together with the induction of strong humoral and cellular immune responses, support further clinical testing of ARCoV at a large scale.

fundingNational Key Research and Development Project of China, Academy of Medical Sciences China, National Natural Science Foundation China, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralChinaCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineImmunoglobulin GmRNA VaccinesPandemicsSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GmRNA VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID35098177
PMCPMC8786321
OpenAlexW4206966300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.