ArticleSTAR protocols2022
Facile isolation of high-affinity nanobodies from synthetic libraries using CDR-swapping mutagenesis.
Article in STAR protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Synthetic Glycans to Investigate Anti-Glycan Antibodies and Explore Their Medical Potential.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Review
- CD98hc-targeted antibody shuttles for central nervous system delivery with broad cross-species reactivity.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Engineered FHA domains can bind to a variety of Phosphothreonine-containing peptides.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2024Article
- Quantitative flow cytometric selection of tau conformational nanobodies specific for pathological aggregates.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Passive Immunotherapy Against SARS-CoV-2: From Plasma-Based Therapy to Single Potent Antibodies in the Race to Stay Ahead of the Variants.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The generation of high-affinity nanobodies for diverse biomedical applications typically requires immunization or affinity maturation. Here, we report a simple protocol using complementarity-determining region (CDR)-swapping mutagenesis to isolate high-affinity nanobodies from common framework libraries. This approach involves shuffling the CDRs of low-affinity variants during the sorting of yeast-displayed libraries to directly isolate high-affinity nanobodies without the need for lead isolation and optimization. We expect this approach, which we demonstrate for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing nanobodies, will simplify the generation of high-affinity nanobodies. For complete details on the use and execution of this profile, please refer to Zupancic et al. (2021).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.