Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35097492›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2022

The Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI to Evaluate Acute Lisfranc Joint Injuries: Comparison With Direct Operative Observations.

Kaoru Kitsukawa, Takaaki Hirano, Hisateru Niki, Natsuki Tachizawa, Hidefumi Mimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Midfoot fractures: Patterns of injury and predictors of stability.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaoru KitsukawaDepartment of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0559-8366
Takaaki HiranoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hisateru NikiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan.
Natsuki TachizawaDepartment of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hidefumi MimuraDepartment of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis is important in patients with Lisfranc joint injury to avoid subsequent complications. As the ligaments in the Lisfranc joint are relatively small and course obliquely, isotropic 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be beneficial to evaluate ligament injury. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI, including isotropic 3D MRI for acute injury of the Lisfranc joint, especially of the interosseous C1-M2 ligament (Lisfranc ligament), the dorsal C1-M2 ligament (dorsal ligament), and the interosseous C1-C2 ligament, compared with direct operative observations.

methodsThis retrospective review identified 27 patients who had undergone MR examination for acute Lisfranc joint injury followed by surgery. We reviewed the operative reports that described the Lisfranc, dorsal, and interosseous C1-C2 ligaments. All patients underwent an MRI, including a 2D oblique plane image parallel to the Lisfranc ligament and an isotropic 3D MRI. An image analysis of the integrity of the 3 ligaments and other associated injuries was performed. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI was analyzed using operative findings as a reference standard.

resultsLisfranc and dorsal ligament injuries were identified on MRI in all patients. MRI depicted disruption of the interosseous C1-C2 ligament in 12 patients. MRI diagnostic accuracy for detection of Lisfranc, dorsal, and interosseous C1-C2 ligaments was 100% (95% CI 0.82-1.0), 74% (95% CI 0.54-0.89), and 70% (95% CI 0.50-0.86), respectively.

conclusionMRI with oblique planes parallel to the Lisfranc ligament and isotropic 3D MRI was reliable for detecting Lisfranc ligament injury, whereas MRI findings of the dorsal and interosseous C1-C2 ligaments were less consistent with operative observations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Indexed as

Lisfranc injuryLisfranc ligamentmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID35097492
PMCPMC8792696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.