Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35097455›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2021

Financial Conflicts of Interest Among Systematic Review Authors Investigating Interventions for Achilles Tendon Ruptures.

W Tanner Cole, Cody Hillman, Adam Corcoran, J Michael Anderson, Michael Weaver, Trevor Torgerson, Micah Hartwell, Matt Vassar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

W Tanner ColeOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Office of Medical Student Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Cody HillmanOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Office of Medical Student Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Adam CorcoranOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Office of Medical Student Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
J Michael AndersonOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Office of Medical Student Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-243X
Michael WeaverOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Office of Medical Student Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Trevor TorgersonOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Office of Medical Student Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Micah HartwellOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Office of Medical Student Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Matt VassarOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Office of Medical Student Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of undisclosed financial conflicts of interest in Achilles tendon rupture repair-focused systematic reviews.

methodsFollowing a cross-sectional study design, we searched MEDLINE and Embase for Achilles tendon rupture repair systematic reviews. We performed screening and data extraction in a blind, triplicate fashion. Each systematic review was evaluated on the individual characteristics of the study, presence of undisclosed and disclosed conflicts of interest, favorability of results and conclusions, and the relationship between conflicts of interest and the favorability of results and conclusions.

resultsOur search produced 172 total systematic reviews pertaining to Achilles tendon rupture repair; of those, only 12 were included in our study. Undisclosed conflicts of interest were found in half (6/12) of the included reviews. However, no significant association was found between conflict of interest and the favorability of results and conclusions.

conclusionUndisclosed conflicts of interests were discovered in a large percentage of our sample. This lack of disclosure did not appear to increase the likelihood of the systematic review results or conclusions reporting favorability of the intervention being investigated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Indexed as

Achilles tendon disordersstatistical analysistrauma

Identifiers

PMID35097455
PMCPMC8702762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.