Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35097393›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2020

Impact of Coleman Block Test on Adult Hindfoot Alignment Assessed by Clinical Examination, Radiography, and Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography.

Ian M Foran, Nasima Mehraban, Stephen K Jacobsen, Daniel D Bohl, Johnny Lin, Kamran S Hamid, Simon Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ian M ForanRush University Medical Center, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6805-2275
Nasima MehrabanRush University Medical Center, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA.
Stephen K JacobsenUniversity of Minnesota, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Cloud, MN, USA.
Daniel D BohlRush University Medical Center, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-4244
Johnny LinRush University Medical Center, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kamran S HamidRush University Medical Center, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA.
Simon LeeRush University Medical Center, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rush University Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCavovarus foot constitutes a complex 3-dimensional deformity. The Coleman block test has traditionally been used to distinguish between forefoot- and hindfoot-driven deformity. However, there has been no objective evaluation of the Coleman block test using radiographs or weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT). The purpose of this study was to compare hindfoot alignment in adult cavovarus feet with and without the Coleman block using clinical examination, radiography, and WBCT.

methodsSix feet in 6 patients with a clinical diagnosis of cavovarus foot deformity were prospectively enrolled. All feet underwent clinical photography with the camera positioned at 0 degrees to the heel, hindfoot alignment view radiography with the beam positioned 20 degrees off the ground, and WBCT, both with and without the Coleman block in place. Clinical photos were characterized using the standing talocalcaneal angle (STCA), radiographs were characterized using the hindfoot alignment angle (HAA), and WBCTs were characterized using manual and automated hindfoot alignment angle (HAA) and foot and ankle offset (FAO). Using paired analyses, measurements taken with the Coleman block in place were compared to those taken without the Coleman block. Finally, the different methods of measuring hindfoot alignment were tested for correlation with each other. Mean age was 56 years (range 38-69).

resultsOn clinical photography, the STCA decreased by 3.8 degrees with addition of the block (from 10.0±6.6 degrees varus without block to 6.2±7.1 degrees varus with block;

conclusionClinical examination, radiograph, and WBCT demonstrated improvements in hindfoot varus using the Coleman block test in adults, but no patient demonstrated complete resolution of deformity regardless of the measurement modality. Clinical examination correlated strongly with automated WBCT measurements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case review.

Indexed as

cavovarusColeman blockhindfoot alignmentweightbearing CT

Identifiers

PMID35097393
PMCPMC8697095
OpenAlexW3046825839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.