Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35097268›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

TransDTI: Transformer-Based Language Models for Estimating DTIs and Building a Drug Recommendation Workflow.

Yogesh Kalakoti, Shashank Yadav, Durai Sundar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  6. Scaling Biomedical Text-Mining: Transformers, GenAI, and Drug Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yogesh KalakotiDAILAB, Department of Biochemical Engineering & Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.
Shashank YadavDAILAB, Department of Biochemical Engineering & Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5741-3215
Durai SundarDAILAB, Department of Biochemical Engineering & Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6549-6663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of novel drug-target interactions is a labor-intensive and low-throughput process. In silico alternatives have proved to be of immense importance in assisting the drug discovery process. Here, we present TransDTI, a multiclass classification and regression workflow employing transformer-based language models to segregate interactions between drug-target pairs as active, inactive, and intermediate. The models were trained with large-scale drug-target interaction (DTI) data sets, which reported an improvement in performance in terms of the area under receiver operating characteristic (auROC), the area under precision recall (auPR), Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC), and

Identifiers

PMID35097268
PMCPMC8792915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.