Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35097219›Full record

ReviewBrain and neuroscience advances

Interaction of sex and cannabis in adult

Ashley M Francis, Jenna N Bissonnette, Sarah E MacNeil, Candice E Crocker, Philip G Tibbo, Derek J Fisher

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain and neuroscience advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley M FrancisDepartment of Psychology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5999-2786
Jenna N BissonnetteDepartment of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Sarah E MacNeilDepartment of Psychology, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Candice E CrockerDepartment of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Philip G TibboDepartment of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Derek J FisherDepartment of Psychology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2366-8225
Dalhousie University · CAMount Saint Vincent University · CASaint Mary's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis has been shown to cause structural and functional neurocognitive changes in heavy users. Cannabis use initiation aligns with brain development trajectories; therefore, it is imperative that the potential neurological implications of cannabis use are understood. Males and females reach neurodevelopmental milestones at different rates making it necessary to consider biological sex in all cannabis and brain-based research. Through use of a systamatic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we aimed to understand the interaction between biological sex and cannabis use on brain-based markers. In total, 18 articles containing a sex-based analysis of cannabis users were identified. While the majority of studies (

Indexed as

biological sexCannabis useelectroencephalographyfMRImagnetic resonance spectroscopyMRIposition emission tomographysex-based researchsex differences

Identifiers

PMID35097219
PMCPMC8793398
OpenAlexW4205329978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.