SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021
Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on the Biopsychosocial Health of Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Chronic Heart Failure: An Integrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative Cardiovascular Outcomes of SGLT2i Plus Low-Dose of Conventional Triple Therapy Versus High-Dose of Conventional Triple Therapy for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF): A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Integrating Findings Into Practice: Assessing External Validity of Congestive Heart Failure Trials.Cardiology research · 2026Article
- Heart failure patients demonstrate excellent 1-year outcomes after total knee arthroplasty despite high healthcare utilization.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Modern heart failure treatment is superior to conventional treatment across the left ventricular ejection spectrum: real-life data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry 2013-2020.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Observational
- Digital Solutions to Optimize Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Prescriptions in Heart Failure Patients: Current Applications and Future Directions.Current heart failure reports · 2024Review
- Article
- 2023 National Heart Center/Saudi Heart Association Focused Update of the 2019 Saudi Heart Association Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2023Article
- Optimal Pharmacologic Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.