Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35096893›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2021

The Role of miRNAs as New Molecular Biomarkers for Dating the Age of Wound Production: A Systematic Review.

Stefania De Simone, Elena Giacani, Maria Antonella Bosco, Simona Vittorio, Michela Ferrara, Giuseppe Bertozzi, Luigi Cipolloni, Raffaele La Russa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefania De SimoneDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Elena GiacaniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Maria Antonella BoscoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Simona VittorioDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Michela FerraraDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giuseppe BertozziDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Luigi CipolloniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Raffaele La RussaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
University of Foggia · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe timing of wounds production is a significant issue in forensic pathology. Although various methods have been evaluated, obtaining an accurate dating of lesions is still a challenge. The pathologist uses many parameters to value wound age, such as histological and immunohistochemical. In recent years, there have been many studies regarding the use of miRNAs in wound-age estimation; indeed, miRNAs have multiple potential uses in forensic pathology. SCOPE: This review aims to verify the efficacy and feasibility of miRNAs as a tool for determining the timing of lesions. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe authors conducted the systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed was used as a search engine to find articles published between January, 1st 2016 and October, 1st 2021, to evaluate the current state of the art regarding wound-age estimation.

resultsA total of 256 articles were collected; after screening according to PRISMA guidelines, the systematic review included 8 articles. The studies included in this review were all Original articles evaluating the use of biomarkers for wound-age determination. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThe literature review showed that analysis of miRNA is an innovative field of study with significant potentiality in forensic pathology. There are few studies, and almost all of them are at an early stage. The challenge is to understand how to standardize the samples' selection to obtain reliable experimental data. This observation represents a necessary prerequisite to planning further clinical trials.

Indexed as

miRNApost-mortem investigationpostmortem miRNAwound-age determinationwound-age estimation

Identifiers

PMID35096893
PMCPMC8795691
OpenAlexW4205753797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.