ArticlePlastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.)2022
Clinical and Radiological Safety of Retained Implantable Doppler Devices Used for Free Flap Monitoring.
Article in Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Challenges of Postoperative Tissue Flap Vitality Monitoring in Obese Individuals.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- MRI safety screening of children with implants: updates and challenges.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionImplantable Doppler devices are reliable adjuncts used for free flap monitoring. Occasionally, the probe/wire is not removed and remains in the soft tissues. The clinical safety of the retained probes and safety and compatibility with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have not been studied. We present a series of retained implantable Doppler probes examining clinic outcomes, safety and compatibility with MRI, and effect on MRI image quality.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted of patients who had an implantable Doppler device for free flap monitoring between July 2007 and August 2018. Routine post-operative imaging was reviewed for all patients to identify incidental findings of a retained probe. A subset of patients with retained implantable Doppler probes who underwent MRI was identified. Magnetic resonance images were reviewed to detect any degradation of image quality.
resultsA total of 323 patients who had an implantable Doppler device placed were reviewed 18 (5.6%) patients were identified with a retained probe and were included in this study. Mean age was 49 years with mean follow-up of 34.4 months. One potential device-related complication occurred in 1 (5.6%) patient. A total of 32 MRI scans were performed in 8 patients with retained devices, including 6 patients who underwent a total of 21 MRIs of the surgical site. There were no complications related to the MRI scans, and we found no significant degradation of image quality.
conclusionRetained implantable Doppler probes were not associated with substantial adverse clinical outcomes nor affected MRI image quality of the surgical site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.