Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35096621›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Optimizing Patient Selection for Irreversible Electroporation of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Analyses of Survival.

Matthew R Woeste, Khaleel D Wilson, Edward J Kruse, Matthew J Weiss, John D Christein, Rebekah R White, Robert C G Martin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Evaluating total tumor load (TTL) to predict metastasis in four or more axillary lymph nodes in HR +/HER2- breast cancer patients: the TULIP4N + study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew R WoesteDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
Khaleel D WilsonDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
Edward J KruseDepartment of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, United States.
Matthew J WeissDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
John D ChristeinDepartment of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Rebekah R WhiteGastrointestinal Cancer Unit, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, United States.
Robert C G MartinDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
University of Louisville · USAugusta University Health · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIrreversible electroporation (IRE) has emerged as a viable consolidative therapy after induction chemotherapy, in which this combination has improved overall survival of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Optimal timing and patient selection for irreversible electroporation remains a clinically unmet need. The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative factors that may assist in predicting progression-free and overall survival following IRE.

methodsA multi-institutional, prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients with LAPC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by open-technique irreversible electroporation from 7/2015-5/2019. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess tumor response and radiological progression. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier and Cox multivariable regression analyses.

results187 LAPC patients (median age 62 years range, 21 - 91, 65% men, 35% women) were treated with IRE. Median PFS was 21.7 months and median OS from diagnosis was 25.5 months. On multivariable analysis, age ≤ 61 (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.21-0.78, p<0.008) and no prior radiation (HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.26-0.94, p=0.03) were positive predictors of OS after IRE. Age ≤ 61(HR 0.53, 95%CI, 0.28-.99, p=0.046) and FOLFIRINOX followed by gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy (HR 0.37,95%CI 0.15-0.89, p=0.027) predicted prolonged PFS after IRE. Abnormal CA19-9 values at the time of surgery negatively impacted both OS (HR 2.46, 95%CI 1.28-4.72, p<0.007) and PFS (HR 2.192, 95%CI 1.143-4.201, p=0.018) following IRE.

conclusionsAge, CA 19-9 response, avoidance of pre-IRE radiation, and FOLFIRINOX plus gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy are prominent factors to consider when referring or selecting LAPC patients to undergo IRE.

Indexed as

irreversible electroporation (IRE)locally advanced pancreatic canceroverall survivalpatient selectionprogression free survivalrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID35096621
PMCPMC8793779
OpenAlexW4206491159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.