Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35096611›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Comprehensive Comparative Molecular Characterization of Young and Old Lung Cancer Patients.

Mingming Hu, Jinjing Tan, Zhentian Liu, Lifeng Li, Hongmei Zhang, Dan Zhao, Baolan Li, Xuan Gao, Nanying Che, Tongmei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multi-omics profiling revealsTranslational lung cancer research · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mingming HuBeijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University & Beijing Tuberculosis and Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Jinjing TanBeijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University & Beijing Tuberculosis and Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Zhentian LiuDepartment of Tranlational Medicine, Geneplus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Lifeng LiDepartment of Tranlational Medicine, Geneplus-Beijing, Beijing, China.
Hongmei ZhangBeijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University & Beijing Tuberculosis and Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Dan ZhaoBeijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University & Beijing Tuberculosis and Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Baolan LiBeijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University & Beijing Tuberculosis and Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Xuan GaoState Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Nanying CheBeijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University & Beijing Tuberculosis and Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Tongmei ZhangBeijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University & Beijing Tuberculosis and Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung lung cancer as a small subgroup of lung cancer has not been fully studied. Most of the previous studies focused on the clinicopathological features, but studies of molecular characteristics are still few and limited. Here, we explore the characteristics of prognosis and variation in young lung cancer patients with NSCLC.

methodsA total of 5639 young lung cancer samples (NSCLC, age ≤40) were screened from the SEER and the same number of the old (NSCLC, age ≥60) were screened by propensity score matching to evaluate the prognosis of two groups. 165 treatment-naïve patients diagnosed with NSCLC were enrolled to explore the molecular feature difference between two age-varying groups. CCLE cell line expression data was used to verify the finding from the cohort of 165 patients.

resultsThe overall survival of the young lung cancer group was significantly better than the old. Germline analysis showed a trend that the young group contained a higher incidence of germline alterations. The TMB of the young group was lower. Meanwhile, the heterogeneity and evolutionary degrees of the young lung cancer group were also lower than the old. The mutation spectrums of two groups exhibited variance with

conclusionsThere were significantly different molecular features of the young lung cancer group. The young lung cancer group had a more simple alteration structure. Alteration spectrums and base substitution types varied between two groups, implying the different pathogenesis. The young lung cancer group had more potential treatment choices. Although young lung patients had better outcomes, there were still adverse factors of them, suggesting that the young group still needs more caution for treatment choice and monitoring after the treatment to further improve the prognosis.

Indexed as

EGFRmolecular characteristicsNSCLCprognosisyoung lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID35096611
PMCPMC8789686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.