ArticleJournal of transport & health2022
Causal evaluation of the health effects of light rail line: A Natural Experiment.
Article in Journal of transport & health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of Walkability, Regional and Transit Accessibility Around Home and Workplace with Active and Sedentary Travel.Journal of transport geography · 2024Article
- Impacts of zero-fare transit policy on health and social determinants: protocol for a natural experiment study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Effects of major urban redesign on sedentary behavior, physical activity, active transport and health-related quality of life in adults.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Impact of a Light Rail Transit Line on Physical Activity: Findings from the Longitudinal Travel Assessment and Community (TRAC) Study.Journal of transport & health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveNo research to date has causally linked built environment data with health care costs derived from clinically assessed health outcomes within the framework of longitudinal intervention design. This study examined the impact of light rail transit (LRT) line intervention on health care costs after controlling for mode-specific objectively assessed moderateto-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), participant-level neighborhood environmental measures, demographics, attitudinal predispositions, and residential choices. DATA AND
methodsBased on a natural experiment related to a new LRT line in Portland - 282 individuals divided into treatment and control groups were prospectively followed during the pre- and post-intervention periods. For each individual, we harness high-resolution data on Electronic Medical Record (EMR) based health care costs, mode-specific MVPA, survey-based travel behavior, attitudinal/perception information, and objectively assessed built environment measures. Simulation-assisted longitudinal grouped random parameter models are developed to gain more accurate insights into the effects of LRT line intervention.
resultsRegarding the "average effect" of the LRT line intervention, no statistically significant reductions in health care costs were observed for the treated individuals over time. However, substantial heterogeneity was observed not only in the magnitude of effects but its direction as well after controlling for the within- and between-individual variations. For a subgroup of treated individuals, the LRT line opening decreased health care costs over time relative to the control group. Further comparative analysis based on the findings of heterogeneity-based models revealed that the effect of LRT intervention for the treated individuals differed by individual characteristics, attitudes/perceptions, and neighborhood level environmental features.
conclusionsThe study revealed the presence of significant effect modifiers and distinct subgroup structures in the data related to the effects of LRT line intervention on health care costs. Severe implications of ignoring unobserved heterogeneity are highlighted. Limitations and potential avenues for future research are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.