Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35096384›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2022

COV-ECGNET: COVID-19 detection using ECG trace images with deep convolutional neural network.

Tawsifur Rahman, Alex Akinbi, Muhammad E H Chowdhury, Tarik A Rashid, Abdulkadir Şengür, Amith Khandakar, Khandaker Reajul Islam, Aras M Ismael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. CovC-ReDRNet: A Deep Learning Model for COVID-19 Classification.Machine learning and knowledge extraction · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tawsifur RahmanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, 2713 Doha, Qatar.
Alex AkinbiSchool of Computer Science and Mathematics, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6980-307X
Muhammad E H ChowdhuryDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, 2713 Doha, Qatar.
Tarik A RashidComputer Science and Engineering Department, School of Science and Engineering, University of Kurdistan Hewler, Erbīl, KRG Iraq.
Abdulkadir ŞengürElectrical-Electronics Engineering Department, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Amith KhandakarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, 2713 Doha, Qatar.
Khandaker Reajul IslamDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, 2713 Doha, Qatar.
Aras M IsmaelInformation Technology Department, College of Informatics, Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reliable and rapid identification of the COVID-19 has become crucial to prevent the rapid spread of the disease, ease lockdown restrictions and reduce pressure on public health infrastructures. Recently, several methods and techniques have been proposed to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus using different images and data. However, this is the first study that will explore the possibility of using deep convolutional neural network (CNN) models to detect COVID-19 from electrocardiogram (ECG) trace images. In this work, COVID-19 and other cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) were detected using deep-learning techniques. A public dataset of ECG images consisting of 1937 images from five distinct categories, such as normal, COVID-19, myocardial infarction (MI), abnormal heartbeat (AHB), and recovered myocardial infarction (RMI) were used in this study. Six different deep CNN models (ResNet18, ResNet50, ResNet101, InceptionV3, DenseNet201, and MobileNetv2) were used to investigate three different classification schemes: (i) two-class classification (normal vs COVID-19); (ii) three-class classification (normal, COVID-19, and other CVDs), and finally, (iii) five-class classification (normal, COVID-19, MI, AHB, and RMI). For two-class and three-class classification, Densenet201 outperforms other networks with an accuracy of 99.1%, and 97.36%, respectively; while for the five-class classification, InceptionV3 outperforms others with an accuracy of 97.83%. ScoreCAM visualization confirms that the networks are learning from the relevant area of the trace images. Since the proposed method uses ECG trace images which can be captured by smartphones and are readily available facilities in low-resources countries, this study will help in faster computer-aided diagnosis of COVID-19 and other cardiac abnormalities.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs)Convolutional neural networksCOVID-19Deep learningElectrocardiogram (ECG)

Identifiers

PMID35096384
PMCPMC8785028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.