Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35096364›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering

Collagenase treatment appears to improve cartilage tissue integration but damage to collagen networks is likely permanent.

Md Shafiullah Shajib, Kathryn Futrega, Travis Jacob Klein, Ross W Crawford, Michael Robert Doran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Md Shafiullah ShajibSchool of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1071-6868
Kathryn FutregaCentre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Travis Jacob KleinCentre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ross W CrawfordCentre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Michael Robert DoranSchool of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5876-4757
National Institutes of Health · USQueensland University of Technology · AUTranslational Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When repairing cartilage defects a major challenge is achieving high-quality integration between the repair tissue and adjacent native cartilage. Matrix-rich cartilage is not easily remodeled, motivating several studies to trial enzyme treatment of the tissue interface to facilitate remodeling and integration. Studying and optimizing such processes is tedious, as well as potentially expensive, and thus simpler models are needed to evaluate the merits of enzyme treatment on cartilage tissue integration. Herein, we used engineered cartilage microtissues formed from bone marrow-derived stromal cells (BMSC) or expanded articular chondrocytes (ACh) to study the impact of enzyme treatment on cartilage tissue integration and matrix remodeling. A 5-min treatment with collagenase appeared to improve cartilage microtissue integration, while up to 48 h treatment with hyaluronidase did not. Alcian blue and anti-collagen II staining suggested that collagenase treatment did facilitate near seamless integration of cartilage microtissues. Microtissue sections were stained with Picrosirius red and characterized using polarized light microscopy, revealing that individual microtissues contained a collagen network organized in concentric shells. While collagenase treatment appeared to improve tissue integration, assessment of the collagen fibers with polarized light indicated that enzymatically damaged networks were not remodeled nor restored during subsequent culture. This model and these data paradoxically suggest that collagen network disruption is required to improve cartilage tissue integration, but that the disrupted collagen networks are unlikely to subsequently be restored. Future studies should attempt to limit collagen network disruption to the surface of the cartilage, and we recommend using Picrosirius red staining and polarized light to assess the quality of matrix remodeling and integration.

Indexed as

Cartilagecollagenintegrationmicrotissueosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID35096364
PMCPMC8793122
OpenAlexW4206957979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.