ArticleJournal of tissue engineering
Collagenase treatment appears to improve cartilage tissue integration but damage to collagen networks is likely permanent.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing Cell Isolation for Adipose- and Synovium Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Infrapatellar Fat Pad.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Article
- Enhanced articular cartilage regeneration using costal chondrocyte-derived scaffold-free tissue engineered constructs with ascorbic acid treatment.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Article
- Targeting ROS in osteoclasts within the OA environment: A novel therapeutic strategy for osteoarthritis management.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When repairing cartilage defects a major challenge is achieving high-quality integration between the repair tissue and adjacent native cartilage. Matrix-rich cartilage is not easily remodeled, motivating several studies to trial enzyme treatment of the tissue interface to facilitate remodeling and integration. Studying and optimizing such processes is tedious, as well as potentially expensive, and thus simpler models are needed to evaluate the merits of enzyme treatment on cartilage tissue integration. Herein, we used engineered cartilage microtissues formed from bone marrow-derived stromal cells (BMSC) or expanded articular chondrocytes (ACh) to study the impact of enzyme treatment on cartilage tissue integration and matrix remodeling. A 5-min treatment with collagenase appeared to improve cartilage microtissue integration, while up to 48 h treatment with hyaluronidase did not. Alcian blue and anti-collagen II staining suggested that collagenase treatment did facilitate near seamless integration of cartilage microtissues. Microtissue sections were stained with Picrosirius red and characterized using polarized light microscopy, revealing that individual microtissues contained a collagen network organized in concentric shells. While collagenase treatment appeared to improve tissue integration, assessment of the collagen fibers with polarized light indicated that enzymatically damaged networks were not remodeled nor restored during subsequent culture. This model and these data paradoxically suggest that collagen network disruption is required to improve cartilage tissue integration, but that the disrupted collagen networks are unlikely to subsequently be restored. Future studies should attempt to limit collagen network disruption to the surface of the cartilage, and we recommend using Picrosirius red staining and polarized light to assess the quality of matrix remodeling and integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.