Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35096363›Full record

ReviewJournal of tissue engineering

Meniscus regeneration by 3D printing technologies: Current advances and future perspectives.

Elena Stocco, Andrea Porzionato, Enrico De Rose, Silvia Barbon, Raffaele De Caro, Veronica Macchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Three-dimensional-printed shape-memory composite scaffold for meniscus repair.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Meniscal Tear Repair: What's New in the Literature?Translational sports medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Collagen-Based Scaffolds for Meniscal Repair and Regeneration.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elena StoccoDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Andrea PorzionatoDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-4717
Enrico De RoseDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7647-1990
Silvia BarbonDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Raffaele De CaroDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Veronica MacchiDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meniscal tears are a frequent orthopedic injury commonly managed by conservative strategies to avoid osteoarthritis development descending from altered biomechanics. Among cutting-edge approaches in tissue engineering, 3D printing technologies are extremely promising guaranteeing for complex biomimetic architectures mimicking native tissues. Considering the anisotropic characteristics of the menisci, and the ability of printing over structural control, it descends the intriguing potential of such vanguard techniques to meet individual joints' requirements within personalized medicine. This literature review provides a state-of-the-art on 3D printing for meniscus reconstruction. Experiences in printing materials/technologies, scaffold types, augmentation strategies, cellular conditioning have been compared/discussed; outcomes of pre-clinical studies allowed for further considerations. To date, translation to clinic of 3D printed meniscal devices is still a challenge: meniscus reconstruction is once again clear expression of how the integration of different expertise (e.g., anatomy, engineering, biomaterials science, cell biology, and medicine) is required to successfully address native tissues complexities.

Indexed as

3D printing and bioprintingMeniscal tearsprintable biomaterialstissue engineeringultrastructure

Identifiers

PMID35096363
PMCPMC8793124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.