ReviewInternational journal of psychological research
An Auditory Stroop Test to Implement in Cognitive Hearing Sciences: Development and Normative Data.
Review in International journal of psychological research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design considerations for technology-assisted fall-resisting skills training trials in older adults: A pilot and feasibility study.PloS one · 2026Trial
- The Effects of Anxiety and Cognitive Load on Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Deep learning for freezing of gait assessment using inertial measurement units: a multicentre validation study.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Physical Activity, Cognitive Function, and Learning Processes: The Role of Environmental Context.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Dual-Task Predictors in Graduate Healthcare Students with Athletic Backgrounds.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2025Article
- Freezing of gait assessment with inertial measurement units and deep learning: effect of tasks, medication states, and stops.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Which Gait Tasks Produce Reliable Outcome Measures of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease?Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2024Article
- Visual and Verbal Working Memory and Processing Speed Across the Adult Lifespan: The Effect of Age, Sex, Educational Level, Awakeness, and Hearing Sensitivity.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study developed and gained insight in an auditory Stroop test, implementable in cognitive hearing sciences.
methodsAn auditory Stroop test was developed and performed in 178 participants, aged between 18 and 69 years. This Auditory Stroop test consisted of two tests: Stroop-tones and Stroop-words whereby the pitch of pure-tones and spoken words (i.e., the words high and low) had to be identified by high or low, respectively. An interference score was calculated as a measure of verbal executive functioning. Regression models were conducted to examine the effect of age, sex, education, awakeness, hearing, as well as visual and verbal working memory, and processing speed on the auditory Stroop scores. Normative data were obtained per age decade.
resultsCompared to the visual counterparts, the auditory Stroop outcomes were better predicted by verbal working memory and processing speed. A trend was observed showing a decrease in performances with increasing age. No other participant-related variables had a significant relationship with the auditory Stroop test.
conclusionThis auditory Stroop test was considered a good test for measuring executive functioning using auditory stimuli. Implementing this auditory Stroop test within cognitive hearing sciences will contribute to unravel the auditory-cognitive perspective of speech understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.