Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35096136›Full record

ReviewComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Review on Epileptic Seizure Prediction: Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches.

Milind Natu, Mrinal Bachute, Shilpa Gite, Ketan Kotecha, Ankit Vidyarthi

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Milind NatuDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunication, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), SIU, Lavale, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-4949
Mrinal BachuteSymbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), SIU, Lavale, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6647-9347
Shilpa GiteComputer Science and Information Technology Department, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed) University, Pune 412115, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3882-7030
Ketan KotechaComputer Science and Information Technology Department, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed) University, Pune 412115, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2653-3780
Ankit VidyarthiDepartment of CSE&IT, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8026-4246
Symbiosis International University · INJaypee Institute of Information Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epileptic seizures occur due to brain abnormalities that can indirectly affect patient's health. It occurs abruptly without any symptoms and thus increases the mortality rate of humans. Almost 1% of world's population suffers from epileptic seizures. Prediction of seizures before the beginning of onset is beneficial for preventing seizures by medication. Nowadays, modern computational tools, machine learning, and deep learning methods have been used to predict seizures using EEG. However, EEG signals may get corrupted with background noise, and artifacts such as eye blinks and physical movements of muscles may lead to "pops" in the signal, resulting in electrical interference, which is cumbersome to detect through visual inspection for longer duration recordings. These limitations in automatic detection of interictal spikes and epileptic seizures are preferred, which is an essential tool for examining and scrutinizing the EEG recording more precisely. These restrictions bring our attention to present a review of automated schemes that will help neurologists categorize epileptic and nonepileptic signals. While preparing this review paper, it is observed that feature selection and classification are the main challenges in epilepsy prediction algorithms. This paper presents various techniques depending on various features and classifiers over the last few years. The methods presented will give a detailed understanding and ideas about seizure prediction and future research directions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMachine LearningAlgorithmsBayes TheoremComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectroencephalographyEpilepsyHumansLogistic ModelsNeural Networks, ComputerSeizuresSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise RatioSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID35096136
PMCPMC8794701
OpenAlexW4205259282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.