Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35096125›Full record

ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2022

Detection and classification of COVID-19 disease from X-ray images using convolutional neural networks and histogram of oriented gradients.

Aleka Melese Ayalew, Ayodeji Olalekan Salau, Bekalu Tadele Abeje, Belay Enyew

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Aleka Melese AyalewDepartment of Information Technology, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.
Ayodeji Olalekan SalauDepartment of Electrical/Electronics and Computer Engineering, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria.
Bekalu Tadele AbejeDepartment of Information Technology, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.
Belay EnyewDepartment of Information Technology, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.
University of Gondar · ETAfe Babalola University · NGHaramaya University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is now regarded as the most lethal disease caused by the novel coronavirus disease of humans. The COVID-19 pandemic has spread to every country on the planet and has wreaked havoc on these countries by increasing the number of human deaths, and in addition, caused intense hunger, and lowered economic productivity. Due to a lack of sufficient radiologist, a restricted amount of COVID-19 test kits is available in hospitals, and this is also accompanied by a shortage of equipment due to the daily increase in cases, as a result of increase in the number of persons infected with COVID-19 . Even for experienced radiologists, examining chest X-rays is a difficult task. Many people have died as a result of inaccurate COVID-19 diagnosis and treatment, as well as ineffective detection measures. This paper, therefore presents a unique detection and classification approach (DCCNet) for quick diagnosis of COVID-19 using chest X-ray images of patients. To achieve quick diagnosis, a convolutional neural network (CNN) and histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) method is proposed in this paper to help medical experts diagnose COVID-19 disease. The diagnostic performance of the hybrid CNN model and HOG-based method was then evaluated using chest X-ray images collected from University of Gondar and online databases. The experiment was performed using Keras (with TensorFlow as a backend) and Python. After the DCCNet model was evaluated, a 99.9% training accuracy and 98.3% test accuracy was achieved, while a 100% training accuracy and 98.5% test accuracy was achieved using HOG. After the evaluation, the hybrid model achieved 99.97% and 99.67% training and testing accuracy for detection and classification of COVID-19 which was better by 1.37% compared to when features were extracted using CNN and 1.17% when HOG was used. The DCCNet achieved a result that outperformed state-of-the-art models by 6.7%.

Indexed as

CNNCOVID-19Deep learningHOGMachine learningSVMYOLOv3

Identifiers

PMID35096125
PMCPMC8789569
OpenAlexW4210383482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.