Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35095986›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Efficient Genome Editing in

Zhen Liang, Yuqing Wu, Lingling Ma, Yingjie Guo, Yidong Ran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Efficient Embryogenic Callus Induction andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Foxtail Millet (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Role of Millets for Food Security Under Climate Change.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Millets for a sustainable future.Journal of experimental botany · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhen LiangSchool of Life Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
Yuqing WuSchool of Life Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
Lingling MaSchool of Life Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
Yingjie GuoInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yidong RanGenovo Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome editing toolbox based on CRISPR/Cas9 has brought revolutionary changes to agricultural and plant scientific research. With the development of stable genetic transformation protocols, a highly efficient genome editing system for foxtail millet (

Indexed as

base editingCRISPR/Cas9genome editingherbicide resistanceSetaria italic

Identifiers

PMID35095986
PMCPMC8793480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.