Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35095971›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2021

Phytohormones Trigger Drought Tolerance in Crop Plants: Outlook and Future Perspectives.

Shehzad Iqbal, Xiukang Wang, Iqra Mubeen, Muhammad Kamran, Iqra Kanwal, Gonzalo A Díaz, Aqleem Abbas, Aasma Parveen, Muhammad Nauman Atiq, Huda Alshaya and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
45.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 230 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nitric Oxide Enhances Drought Tolerance inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Shehzad IqbalFaculty of Agriculture Sciences, Universidad De Talca, Talca, Chile.
Xiukang WangShaanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Jujube, College of Life Sciences, Yan'an University, Yan'an, China.
Iqra MubeenKey Lab of Integrated Crop Disease and Pest Management of Shandong Province, College of Plant Health and Medicine, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China.
Muhammad KamranSchool of Agriculture, Food, and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Iqra KanwalDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Gonzalo A DíazFaculty of Agriculture Sciences, Universidad De Talca, Talca, Chile.
Aqleem AbbasCollege of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Aasma ParveenDepartment of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Muhammad Nauman AtiqCollege of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Huda AlshayaCell and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, NC, United States.
Tarek K Zin El-AbedinDepartment of Agriculture and Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Shah FahadHainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresource, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Talca · CLAlexandria University · EGHainan University · CNIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKQingdao Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USYan'an University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past and present, human activities have been involved in triggering global warming, causing drought stresses that affect animals and plants. Plants are more defenseless against drought stress; and therefore, plant development and productive output are decreased. To decrease the effect of drought stress on plants, it is crucial to establish a plant feedback mechanism of resistance to drought. The drought reflex mechanisms include the physical stature physiology and biochemical, cellular, and molecular-based processes. Briefly, improving the root system, leaf structure, osmotic-balance, comparative water contents and stomatal adjustment are considered as most prominent features against drought resistance in crop plants. In addition, the signal transduction pathway and reactive clearance of oxygen are crucial mechanisms for coping with drought stress via calcium and phytohormones such as abscisic acid, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, auxin, gibberellin, ethylene, brassinosteroids and peptide molecules. Furthermore, microorganisms, such as fungal and bacterial organisms, play a vital role in increasing resistance against drought stress in plants. The number of characteristic loci, transgenic methods and the application of exogenous substances [nitric oxide, (C

Indexed as

drought stressgenesmicroorganismsphytohormonestolerance mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID35095971
PMCPMC8792739
OpenAlexW4205174573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.