Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35095891›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2021

An Overview of Transcriptional Responses of Schistosome-Susceptible (M line) or -Resistant (BS-90)

Lijun Lu, Lijing Bu, Si-Ming Zhang, Sarah K Buddenborg, Eric S Loker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unveiling the hemolymphatic miRNome composition of the schistosomiasis vector snailCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Accelerating snail vector genomics.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lijun LuCenter for Evolutionary and Theoretical Immunology, Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Lijing BuCenter for Evolutionary and Theoretical Immunology, Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Si-Ming ZhangCenter for Evolutionary and Theoretical Immunology, Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Sarah K BuddenborgWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Eric S LokerCenter for Evolutionary and Theoretical Immunology, Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30GM110907 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI MILLER, ROBERT D · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
Snail-Related Studies of Transmission & Control of Schistosomiasis in KenyaR37AI101438 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI ERIC SAMUEL LOKER · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Genomic basis of anti-schistosome resistance in snailsR21AI132953 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI ZHANG, SI-MING · 2019 to 2020
$430k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI132953NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI101438NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We seek to provide a comprehensive overview of transcriptomics responses of immune-related features of the gastropod Methods: RNA-Seq and differential expression analysis were undertaken on 56 snails from 14 groups. We considered 7 response categories: 1) constitutive resistance factors; 2) constitutive susceptibility factors; 3) generalized stress responses; 4) induced resistance factors; 5) resistance factors suppressed in SUS snails; 6) suppressed/manipulated factors in SUS snails; and 7) tolerance responses in SUS snails. We also undertook a gene co-expression network analysis. Results from prior studies identifying schistosome resistance/susceptibility factors were examined relative to our findings. Results: A total of 792 million paired-end reads representing 91.2% of the estimated 31,985 genes in the Bg genome were detected and results for the 7 categories compiled and highlighted. For both RES and SUS snails, a single most supported network of genes with highly correlated expression was found. Conclusions: 1) Several constitutive differences in gene expression between SUS and RES snails were noted, the majority over-represented in RES; 2) There was little indication of a generalized stress response shared by SUS and RES snails at 0.5 or 2 dpe; 3) RES snails mounted a strong, multi-faceted response by 0.5 dpe that carried over to 2 dpe; 4) The most notable SUS responses were at 40 dpe, in snails shedding cercariae, when numerous features were either strongly down-regulated indicative of physiological distress or parasite manipulation, or up-regulated, suggestive of tolerance or survival-promoting effects; 5) Of 55 genes previously identified in genome wide mapping studies, 29 (52.7%) were responsive to Sm, as were many familiar resistance-associated genes (41.0%) identified by other means; 6) Both network analysis and remarkably specific patterns of expression of lectins and G protein-coupled receptors in categories 4, 6 and 7 were indicative of orchestrated responses of different suites of genes in SUS or RES snails following exposure to Sm.

Indexed as

Schistosoma mansoniAnimalsBiomphalariaComputational BiologyDisease ResistanceDisease SusceptibilityGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksHost-Parasite InteractionsMolecular Sequence AnnotationParasitic Diseases, AnimalRNA-SeqSchistosomiasis mansoniBiomphalaria glabratacomparative immunologyRNA-sequencingSchistosoma mansonischistosomiasistranscriptomicsvector biology

Identifiers

PMID35095891
PMCPMC8791074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.