Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35095749›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021

Perspectives on Primary Blast Injury of the Brain: Translational Insights Into Non-inertial Low-Intensity Blast Injury.

Heather R Siedhoff, Shanyan Chen, Hailong Song, Jiankun Cui, Ibolja Cernak, David X Cifu, Ralph G DePalma, Zezong Gu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Blast Injuries.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Heather R SiedhoffDepartment of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States.
Shanyan ChenDepartment of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States.
Hailong SongDepartment of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States.
Jiankun CuiDepartment of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States.
Ibolja CernakDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, GA, United States.
David X CifuDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States.
Ralph G DePalmaOffice of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, United States.
Zezong GuDepartment of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States.
Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital · USUniversity of Missouri · USMercer University · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

BLRD VA I50 BX005878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) during military deployment or training are clinically "mild" and frequently caused by non-impact blast exposures. Experimental models were developed to reproduce the biological consequences of high-intensity blasts causing moderate to severe brain injuries. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms of low-intensity blast (LIB)-induced neurological deficits have been understudied. This review provides perspectives on primary blast-induced mild TBI models and discusses translational aspects of LIB exposures as defined by standardized physical parameters including overpressure, impulse, and shock wave velocity. Our mouse LIB-exposure model, which reproduces deployment-related scenarios of open-field blast (OFB), caused neurobehavioral changes, including reduced exploratory activities, elevated anxiety-like levels, impaired nesting behavior, and compromised spatial reference learning and memory. These functional impairments associate with subcellular and ultrastructural neuropathological changes, such as myelinated axonal damage, synaptic alterations, and mitochondrial abnormalities occurring in the absence of gross- or cellular damage. Biochemically, we observed dysfunctional mitochondrial pathways that led to elevated oxidative stress, impaired fission-fusion dynamics, diminished mitophagy, decreased oxidative phosphorylation, and compensated cell respiration-relevant enzyme activity. LIB also induced increased levels of total tau, phosphorylated tau, and amyloid β peptide, suggesting initiation of signaling cascades leading to neurodegeneration. We also compare translational aspects of OFB findings to alternative blast injury models. By scoping relevant recent research findings, we provide recommendations for future preclinical studies to better reflect military-operational and clinical realities. Overall, better alignment of preclinical models with clinical observations and experience related to military injuries will facilitate development of more precise diagnosis, clinical evaluation, treatment, and rehabilitation.

Indexed as

behavioral abnormalitiesdiffuse axonal injurylow-intensity blast (LIB)mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)mitochondrial dysfunctionneurodegenerationneurovascular impairmentssynaptic alterations

Identifiers

PMID35095749
PMCPMC8794583
OpenAlexW4205403688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.