ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2021
Impact of the Expert Consensus on Carbapenem Consumption Trends and Patterns in Public Healthcare Institutes: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis, 2017-2020.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends and relationship between antibiotic consumption and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria at a tertiary hospital in shaanxi, China from 2011 to 2023.New microbes and new infections · 2025Article
- Prevalence and factors with potentially inappropriate prescribing among older outpatients with depression: a multicentre study across China.Journal of global health · 2025Observational
- Impact of Chinese criteria on potentially inappropriate medication use in China.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Problems and challenges encountered by Chinese medical institutions in implementing the national centralized drug procurement.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Impact of the expert consensus on polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly lung cancer outpatients with multimorbidity: An interrupted time series analysis, 2016-2021.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.